Using Mixed Methods to Facilitate Complex, Multiphased Health Research

From conceptualization to application and evaluation, research is conducted in a context of increasing complexity of disciplines, goals, communities, and partnerships. Researchers often are challenged to demonstrate the rigor of their methods and results to audiences with diverse backgrounds and dis...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inInternational journal of qualitative methods Vol. 15; no. 1; p. 160940691562457
Main Authors Strudsholm, Tina, Meadows, Lynn M., Robinson Vollman, Ardene, Thurston, Wilfreda (Billie) E., Henderson, Rita
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Los Angeles, CA SAGE Publications 01.12.2016
Sage Publications Ltd
SAGE Publishing
Subjects
Academic achievement
Audiences
Competence
Data collection
Dentists
Dietitians
Environmental health
Evaluation research
Experts
Health research
Inspectors
Leadership
Medical research
Mixed methods research
Nurses
Participation
Partnerships
Physicians
Public health
Public policy
Research applications
Research methodology
mixed methods research
public health
leadership competencies
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

More Information
Summary:From conceptualization to application and evaluation, research is conducted in a context of increasing complexity of disciplines, goals, communities, and partnerships. Researchers often are challenged to demonstrate the rigor of their methods and results to audiences with diverse backgrounds and disciplinary expertise. This article illustrates the benefits of using mixed methods approaches in research designed to address issues in complex research projects. It outlines the implementation of a private, public, and academic partnership, where scientific merit of methods and results was a critical foundation to the development of public policy. The overall goal of the Public Health Leadership Competencies Project (the Project) was to identify public health leadership competencies that could apply to public health practice across the country. This research demonstrates how mixed methods research in public health might be of perceived benefit to complex projects. The Project included challenges and opportunities through multiple phases of data collection and participation of members from each of the seven disciplines in public health (i.e., public health dentists, physicians, dietitians, and nurses, as well as epidemiologists, health promoters, and environmental health inspectors). The discussion addresses challenges of a national project, the complex organizational framework within which we were directed to work, and the lessons associated with using multiple sources of data.
ISSN:1609-4069
1609-4069
DOI:10.1177/1609406915624579