Co-Administration of Injected and Oral Vaccine Candidates Elicits Improved Immune Responses over Either Route Alone

• Published in: Vaccines (Basel) Vol. 8; no. 1; p. 37
• Main Authors: Hayden, Celine A, Landrock, Danilo, Hung, Chiung Yu, Ostroff, Gary, Fake, Gina M, Walker, John H, Kier, Ann, Howard, John A
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Switzerland MDPI AG 21.01.2020; MDPI
• Subjects: bioencapsulation; Dosage and administration; Immune response; immunogenicity; maize oral vaccine; mucosal; Observations; Oral vaccines; Patient outcomes; plant vaccine; subunit vaccine; supercritical fluid extraction; United States; supercritical fluid extraction; subunit vaccine; bioencapsulation; plant vaccine; maize oral vaccine; immunogenicity; mucosal
• ISSN: 2076-393X; 2076-393X
• DOI: 10.3390/vaccines8010037

Infectious diseases continue to be a significant cause of morbidity and mortality, and although efficacious vaccines are available for many diseases, some parenteral vaccines elicit little or no mucosal antibodies which can be a significant problem since mucosal tissue is the point of entry for 90% of pathogens. In order to provide protection for both serum and mucosal areas, we have tested a combinatorial approach of both parenteral and oral administration of antigens for diseases caused by a viral pathogen, Hepatitis B, and a fungal pathogen, . We demonstrate that co-administration by the parenteral and oral routes is a useful tool to increase the overall immune response. This can include achieving an immune response in tissues that are not elicited when using only one route of administration, providing a higher level of response that can lead to fewer required doses or possibly providing a better response for individuals that are considered poor or non-responders.