Comparison of pre- and inter-stage aerobic treatment of wastewater sludge: Effects on biogas production and COD removal
[Display omitted] •Inter-stage TAD had less oxidation loss than pre-treatment.•TAD pre-treatment reduced CH4 yield while inter-stage increased it slightly (1.8–2.6%).•Combined anaerobic/aerobic treatment can substantially increase COD removal.•TAD increased methane yield from previously digested slu...
Saved in:
Published in | Bioresource technology Vol. 247; pp. 332 - 339 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
England
Elsevier Ltd
01.01.2018
Elsevier |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | [Display omitted]
•Inter-stage TAD had less oxidation loss than pre-treatment.•TAD pre-treatment reduced CH4 yield while inter-stage increased it slightly (1.8–2.6%).•Combined anaerobic/aerobic treatment can substantially increase COD removal.•TAD increased methane yield from previously digested sludge >40%.•TAD treatment is best for recalcitrant substrates or in an inter-stage configuration.
The aim of this study was to investigate thermophilic (55°C) aerobic digestion (TAD) as pre- and inter-stage treatment of sludge anaerobic digestion and to analyse the change in organic matter accessibility and complexity. Pre-treatment decreased methane yield (up to −70%), due to oxidation losses whereas inter-stage treatment slightly improved overall methane yield (+2.6%) and total COD removal (+5%) compared to control. Anaerobic degradability and COD removal in the second anaerobic stage significantly increased, by 13–40%. Organic matter fractionation showed that TAD led to an increase in sludge organic matter accessibility in all cases. Organic matter complexity, measured by fluorimetry, increased after TAD pre-treatment whereas it remained constant after inter-stage treatment. TAD was shown to be more efficient if applied to a more recalcitrant substrate and should thus be used as inter-stage treatment to avoid decreasing methane production. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 |
ISSN: | 0960-8524 1873-2976 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.biortech.2017.08.128 |