Evaluation of the therapeutic efficacy of Mentha crispa in the treatment of giardiasis

It's estimated that around 200million people are annually infected with Giardia lamblia, making the disease a major cause of morbidity worldwide. The current treatment of giardiasis includes the use of several drugs, among them, herbal medicines formulated with Mentha crispa. Thus, the purpose...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inContemporary clinical trials Vol. 32; no. 6; pp. 809 - 813
Main Authors Teles, Naracélia S.B., Fechine, Francisco V., Viana, Fernando André C., Viana, Ismenia O.L., Nascimento, Demétrius F., Leite, Ana Lourdes A.S., Bezerra, Fernando Antônio Frota, Moraes, Manoel Odorico, Moraes, Maria Elisabete A.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published New York, NY Elsevier Inc 01.11.2011
Elsevier
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:It's estimated that around 200million people are annually infected with Giardia lamblia, making the disease a major cause of morbidity worldwide. The current treatment of giardiasis includes the use of several drugs, among them, herbal medicines formulated with Mentha crispa. Thus, the purpose of this study was to evaluate the therapeutic efficacy of M. crispa in the treatment of giardiasis. The research consisted initially of a cross-sectional study for the selection of subjects with giardiasis. After that, there was a randomized, open, in parallel with active control study, in order to verify the therapeutic efficacy of M. crispa in the treatment of giardiasis. Coprology samples were collected from 1622 patients between May 2005 and May 2007 for a series of parasitological examinations. Ninety-six patients with G. lamblia were selected, which were then distributed randomly into two groups: Secnidazole, consisting of 50 patients treated with 2g of Secnidazole and M. crispa, containing 46 patients treated with 2g of M. crispa. After 7days, healing was evaluated by enzyme immunoassay in a fresh fecal sample. Additionally, the subjects were questioned about possible adverse effects and answered a questionnaire covering socioeconomic and hydrosanitary issues. The analysis of the clinical trial data showed that the cure rate for the Secnidazole group (84.0%) was significantly higher (P=0.0002) as that verified in the M. crispa group (47.83%). Therefore, the study concludes that, in the dose used in this trial, the effect of M. crispa in the treatment of giardisis is less effective than that of Secnidazole.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
ObjectType-Undefined-3
ISSN:1551-7144
1559-2030
1559-2030
DOI:10.1016/j.cct.2011.08.005