Change in Carotid Blood Flow and Carotid Corrected Flow Time Assessed by Novice Sonologists Fails to Determine Fluid Responsiveness in Spontaneously Breathing Intensive Care Unit Patients

• Published in: Ultrasound in medicine & biology Vol. 46; no. 10; pp. 2659 - 2666
• Main Authors: Abbasi, Adeel, Azab, Nader, Nayeemuddin, Mohammed, Schick, Alexandra, Lopardo, Thomas, Phillips, Gary S., Merchant, Roland C., Levy, Mitchell M., Blaivas, Michael, Corl, Keith A.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: England Elsevier Inc 01.10.2020
• Subjects: Carotid blood flow; Carotid ultrasound; Carotid-corrected flow time; Fluid responsiveness; Point-of-care ultrasound; Point-of-care ultrasound; Carotid blood flow; Carotid-corrected flow time; Fluid responsiveness; Carotid ultrasound
• ISSN: 0301-5629; 1879-291X
• DOI: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2020.07.001

Measurement of carotid blood flow (CBF) and corrected carotid flow time (ccFT) has been proposed as a non-invasive means of determining fluid responsiveness. We evaluated the ability of CBF and ccFT as assessed by novice sonologists to determine fluid responsiveness in intensive care unit patients. Three novice physician sonologists performed carotid ultrasounds before and after a fluid bolus and calculated changes in CBF and ccFT. Fluid responsiveness was defined as a ≥10% increase in cardiac index as measured using bioreactance. Of 112 participants, 56 (50%) were fluid responders. Changes in CBF and ccFT performed poorly at determining fluid responsiveness: 19 mL/min (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve: 0.58, 95% confidence interval: 0.47–0.68) and 6 ms (0.59, 0.46–0.65) respectively. Novice physician sonologists are unable to determine fluid responsiveness using CBF or ccFT. Further research is needed to identify the key limiting factors in using carotid ultrasound to determine fluid responsiveness.