Vaccine Hesitancy in Sub-Saharan Africa in the Context of COVID-19 Vaccination Exercise: A Systematic Review

• Published in: Diseases Vol. 11; no. 1; p. 32
• Main Author: Ochola, Elizabeth A.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Switzerland MDPI AG 09.02.2023; MDPI
• Subjects: Coronaviruses; COVID-19; COVID-19 vaccines; Epidemics; Health care; Herd immunity; infectious diseases; pandemic; Pandemics; Public good; Public health; sub-Saharan Africa (SSA); Systematic Review; Trust; Utilitarianism; vaccine hesitancy; vaccines; Sub-Saharan Africa; Africa; COVID-19; vaccine hesitancy; vaccines; bioethics; infectious diseases; sub-Saharan Africa (SSA); pandemic; utilitarianism
• ISSN: 2079-9721; 2079-9721
• DOI: 10.3390/diseases11010032

Presently, the COVID-19 vaccine is seen as a means to an end in light of other challenges, such as vaccine inequity. Through COVID-19 Vaccines Global Access (COVAX), an initiative founded to guarantee fair and equitable distribution, vaccine hesitancy remains a critical component that needs to be addressed in sub-Saharan Africa. Utilizing a documentary search strategy and using the keywords and subject headings Utilitarianism and COVID-19 or Vaccine hesitancy and sub-Saharan Africa, this paper identified 67 publications from different databases (PubMed, Scopus and Web of Science), which were further screened by title and full text to achieve (n = 6) publications that were analyzed. The reviewed papers demonstrate that vaccine hesitancy occurs against a colonial backdrop of inequities in global health research, social–cultural complexities, poor community involvement and public distrust. All of these factors undermine the confidence that is crucial for sustaining collective immunity in vaccine programs. Even though mass vaccination programs are known to limit personal freedom, the exchange of information between healthcare professionals and citizens must be improved to encourage complete disclosure of vaccine information at the point of delivery. Moreover, addressing components of vaccine hesitancy should involve relying not on coercive public policies but on consistent ethical strategies that go beyond current healthcare ethics toward broader bioethics.