Comparing CNNs and PLSr for estimating wheat organs biophysical variables using proximal sensing

• Published in: Frontiers in plant science Vol. 14; p. 1204791
• Main Authors: Carlier, Alexis, Dandrifosse, Sébastien, Dumont, Benjamin, Mercatoris, Benoit
• Format: Journal Article Web Resource
• Language: English
• Published: Frontiers Media SA 20.11.2023; Frontiers Media S.A
• Subjects: Agriculture & agronomie; Agriculture & agronomy; biophysical variables; close-range sensing; CNN; Engineering, computing & technology; Ingénierie, informatique & technologie; Life sciences; multi-task; phenotyping; Plant Science; PLSr; Sciences du vivant; wheat
• ISSN: 1664-462X; 1664-462X
• DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2023.1204791

Estimation of biophysical vegetation variables is of interest for diverse applications, such as monitoring of crop growth and health or yield prediction. However, remote estimation of these variables remains challenging due to the inherent complexity of plant architecture, biology and surrounding environment, and the need for features engineering. Recent advancements in deep learning, particularly convolutional neural networks (CNN), offer promising solutions to address this challenge. Unfortunately, the limited availability of labeled data has hindered the exploration of CNNs for regression tasks, especially in the frame of crop phenotyping. In this study, the effectiveness of various CNN models in predicting wheat dry matter, nitrogen uptake, and nitrogen concentration from RGB and multispectral images taken from tillering to maturity was examined. To overcome the scarcity of labeled data, a training pipeline was devised. This pipeline involves transfer learning, pseudo-labeling of unlabeled data and temporal relationship correction. The results demonstrated that CNN models significantly benefit from the pseudolabeling method, while the machine learning approach employing a PLSr did not show comparable performance. Among the models evaluated, EfficientNetB4 achieved the highest accuracy for predicting above-ground biomass, with an R² value of 0.92. In contrast, Resnet50 demonstrated superior performance in predicting LAI, nitrogen uptake, and nitrogen concentration, with R² values of 0.82, 0.73, and 0.80, respectively. Moreover, the study explored multi-output models to predict the distribution of dry matter and nitrogen uptake between stem, inferior leaves, flag leaf, and ear. The findings indicate that CNNs hold promise as accessible and promising tools for phenotyping quantitative biophysical variables of crops. However, further research is required to harness their full potential.