What Are We Fighting For?: The Effects of Framing on Ingroup Identification and Allegiance

Two studies were conducted examining the impact of framing on ingroup identification and allegiance in the context of international conflicts. The first study was carried out among British students at the beginning of the war in Afghanistan (N = 69). Perceptions of the war were manipulated by varyin...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inThe Journal of social psychology Vol. 153; no. 1; pp. 25 - 37
Main Authors Adarves-Yorno, Inmaculada, Jetten, Jolanda, Postmes, Tom, Haslam, S. Alexander
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Philadelphia, PA Taylor & Francis Group 01.01.2013
Taylor & Francis
Taylor & Francis Inc
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Two studies were conducted examining the impact of framing on ingroup identification and allegiance in the context of international conflicts. The first study was carried out among British students at the beginning of the war in Afghanistan (N = 69). Perceptions of the war were manipulated by varying the frame that determined whether the war was perceived as positive and just or negative. Participants provided with a positive frame on the war identified more with their ingroup (Britain), and displayed higher allegiance to the United States than when given a negative frame. These findings were replicated in a second study conducted in the context of the second Iraq war (N = 51). Discussion focuses on the way in which framing affects perceptions of intergroup relations and the relationship between self, ingroup and out-group(s).
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ObjectType-Article-2
ObjectType-Feature-1
ISSN:0022-4545
1940-1183
DOI:10.1080/00224545.2012.701673