A Prospective Observational Study of Candidemia: Epidemiology, Therapy, and Influences on Mortality in Hospitalized Adult and Pediatric Patients

We conducted a prospective, multicenter observational study of adults (n = 1447) and children (n = 144) with candidemia at tertiary care centers in the United States in parallel with a candidemia treatment trial that included nonneutropenic adults. Candida albicans was the most common bloodstream is...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inClinical infectious diseases Vol. 37; no. 5; pp. 634 - 643
Main Authors Pappas, Peter G., Rex, John H., Lee, Jeannette, Hamill, Richard J., Larsen, Robert A., Powderly, William, Kauffman, Carol A., Hyslop, Newton, Mangino, Julie E., Chapman, Stanley, Horowitz, Harold W., Edwards, John E., Dismukes, William E.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Chicago, IL The University of Chicago Press 01.09.2003
University of Chicago Press
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:We conducted a prospective, multicenter observational study of adults (n = 1447) and children (n = 144) with candidemia at tertiary care centers in the United States in parallel with a candidemia treatment trial that included nonneutropenic adults. Candida albicans was the most common bloodstream isolate recovered from adults and children (45% vs. 49%) and was associated with high mortality (47% among adults vs. 29% among children). Three-month survival was better among children than among adults (76% vs. 54%; P < .001). Most children received amphotericin B as initial therapy, whereas most adults received fluconazole. In adults, Candida parapsilosis fungemia was associated with lower mortality than was non-parapsilosis candidemia (24% vs. 46%; P < .001). Mortality was similar among subjects with Candida glabrata or non-glabrata candidemia; mortality was also similar among subjects with C. glabrata candidemia who received fluconazole rather than other antifungal therapy. Subjects in the observational cohort had higher Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II scores than did participants in the clinical trial (18.6 vs. 16.1), which suggests that the former subjects are more often excluded from therapeutic trials.
Bibliography:istex:E9FD0EA61B51260AE1F1700AAB73A0B8E74FB708
Members of the study group are listed at the end of the text.
ark:/67375/HXZ-FN44Z60L-L
ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
ObjectType-Undefined-3
ISSN:1058-4838
1537-6591
1537-6591
DOI:10.1086/376906