Decentralised federated learning with adaptive partial gradient aggregation

Federated learning aims to collaboratively train a machine learning model with possibly geo-distributed workers, which is inherently communication constrained. To achieve communication efficiency, the conventional federated learning algorithms allow the worker to decrease the communication frequency...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inCAAI Transactions on Intelligence Technology Vol. 5; no. 3; pp. 230 - 236
Main Authors Jiang, Jingyan, Hu, Liang
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Beijing The Institution of Engineering and Technology 01.09.2020
John Wiley & Sons, Inc
Wiley
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Federated learning aims to collaboratively train a machine learning model with possibly geo-distributed workers, which is inherently communication constrained. To achieve communication efficiency, the conventional federated learning algorithms allow the worker to decrease the communication frequency by training the model locally for multiple times. Conventional federated learning architecture, inherited from the parameter server design, relies on highly centralised topologies and large nodes-to-server bandwidths, and convergence property relies on the stochastic gradient descent training in local, which usually causes the large end-to-end training latency in real-world federated learning scenarios. Thus, in this study, the authors propose the adaptive partial gradient aggregation method, a gradient partial level decentralised federated learning, to tackle this problem. In FedPGA, they propose a partial gradient exchange mechanism that makes full use of node-to-node bandwidth for speeding up the communication time. Besides, an adaptive model updating method further reduces the convergence rate by adaptive increasing the step size of the stable direction of gradient descent. The experimental results on various datasets demonstrate that the training time is reduced up to $14 \times $14× compared to baselines without accuracy degrade.
ISSN:2468-2322
2468-2322
DOI:10.1049/trit.2020.0082