Tumor Response and Symptom Palliation from RAINBOW, a Phase III Trial of Ramucirumab Plus Paclitaxel in Previously Treated Advanced Gastric Cancer

Background In the intent‐to‐treat (ITT) population of the RAINBOW study, objective response rate (ORR) was 28% and 16% in the ramucirumab and control arms, respectively. To further characterize tumor response, we present details on timing and extent of tumor shrinkage, as well as associations with s...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inThe oncologist (Dayton, Ohio) Vol. 26; no. 3; pp. e414 - e424
Main Authors Cascinu, Stefano, Bodoky, György, Muro, Kei, Van Cutsem, Eric, Oh, Sang Cheul, Folprecht, Gunnar, Ananda, Sumitra, Girotto, Gustavo, Wainberg, Zev A., Miron, Maria Luisa Limon, Ajani, Jaffer, Wei, Ran, Liepa, Astra M., Carlesi, Roberto, Emig, Michael, Ohtsu, Atsushi
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Hoboken, USA John Wiley & Sons, Inc 01.03.2021
Oxford University Press
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Background In the intent‐to‐treat (ITT) population of the RAINBOW study, objective response rate (ORR) was 28% and 16% in the ramucirumab and control arms, respectively. To further characterize tumor response, we present details on timing and extent of tumor shrinkage, as well as associations with symptom palliation. Materials and Methods Tumor response was assessed with RECIST v1.1, and quality of life (QoL) was assessed with the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality‐of‐Life Questionnaire‐Core 30 (EORTC QLQ‐C30) v3.0. Prespecified and post hoc analyses were conducted in the ITT population, patients with measurable disease, or responders, and included best overall response (BOR), ORR, disease control rate (DCR), duration of response, time to response (TtR), change in tumor size, and associations of QoL with tumor shrinkage and BOR. Results In both treatment arms, median TtR was 1.5 months. Responses were more durable in the ramucirumab versus control arm (median 4.4 vs. 2.8 months). In patients with measurable disease (78% of ITT), ORR was 36% versus 20%; DCR was 81% versus 61% in the ramucirumab versus control arms. Waterfall plots demonstrated more tumor shrinkage in the ramucirumab versus control arm. Regardless of treatment, tumor response and stable disease were associated with improved or stable QoL, with more tumor shrinkage associated with greater symptom palliation. Conclusion Treatment with ramucirumab plus paclitaxel yielded the highest ORR reported to date for patients with previously treated advanced gastric or gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma. Additional details demonstrate robustness of tumor response results. The extent of tumor shrinkage is directly associated with symptom palliation and should be considered when evaluating patient needs and treatment selection. Clinical trial identification number. NCT01170663. Implications for Practice Ramucirumab plus paclitaxel is a recognized standard of care as it improves survival for patients with advanced gastric or gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma who have been previously treated with recommended first‐line therapy. These additional data on tumor response demonstrate a positive association between tumor shrinkage and symptom palliation in a patient population that is often symptomatic. These observations included patients with nonmeasurable disease, a group of patients often underrepresented in clinical trials. This knowledge can inform treatment decisions, which align individual patient characteristics and needs with demonstrated benefits. To further characterize tumor response and disease‐related symptoms from the RAINBOW study, this article presents details on timing and extent of tumor shrinkage and the association of response with symptom palliation. The reported results provide additional context for considering second‐line options for patients with advanced gastric/gastroesophageal cancer.
Bibliography:For permission information contact
permissions@wiley.com
commercialreprints@wiley.com
.
Disclosures of potential conflicts of interest may be found at the end of this article
No part of this article may be reproduced, stored, or transmitted in any form or for any means without the prior permission in writing from the copyright holder. For information on purchasing reprints contact
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
Disclosures of potential conflicts of interest may be found at the end of this article.
No part of this article may be reproduced, stored, or transmitted in any form or for any means without the prior permission in writing from the copyright holder. For information on purchasing reprints contact commercialreprints@wiley.com. For permission information contact permissions@wiley.com.
ISSN:1083-7159
1549-490X
1549-490X
DOI:10.1002/onco.13623