Current status of optical scanning in facial prosthetics: A systematic review and meta-analysis

• Published in: Journal of Prosthodontic Research Vol. 68; no. 1; pp. 1 - 11
• Main Authors: König, János, Kelemen, Kata, Czumbel, László Márk, Szabó, Bence, Varga, Gábor, Borbély, Judit, Németh, Orsolya, Hegyi, Péter, Hermann, Péter
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Japan Japan Prosthodontic Society 01.01.2024
• Subjects: Dimensional measurement accuracy; Face; Fiducial markers; Humans; Imaging, Three-Dimensional; Maxillofacial prosthesis; Dimensional measurement accuracy; Fiducial markers; Face; Maxillofacial prosthesis
• ISSN: 1883-1958; 2212-4632; 1883-9207
• DOI: 10.2186/jpr.JPR_D_22_00221

Purpose To assess the accuracy of scanning technologies for constructing facial prostheses on human faces.Study selection Our systematic search was performed on five databases. Studies reporting on human volunteers (P) whose faces were scanned with a scanning technology were eligible. The anthropometrical interlandmark distances (ILDs) were used as indicators of accuracy; the ILDs are measured on the virtual models (I) and directly on the faces (C). The virtual models deviated from their true values (O). Studies reporting the measurements on patients with or without facial deformities were included, but cadavers or inanimate objects were reasons for exclusion. We performed a mean difference (MD) / standardized MD analysis with a random effect model. The difficulties regarding the scanning procedure mentioned in the articles were also assessed.Results We found 3723 records after duplicate removal. Twenty five articles were eligible for the qualitative review, and ten articles were included in the quantitative synthesis. Eight different ILDs were compared in MD analyses. The differences were between -0.54-0.43 mm. We also performed a regional three-dimensional analysis to compare scanning technologies in each major region. No significant differences were found in any of the regions and axes. The most mentioned difficulties were artifacts due to motion or blinking.Conclusions The results suggest no systematic skew in linear dimensions neither between direct caliper measurements nor between measurements on the scanned models, scanning technologies, or facial regions.