People with learning disabilities in a low secure in-patient unit: comparison of offenders and non-offenders

People with learning disability who exhibit challenging behaviour are frequently segregated from services and local teams are often reluctant to receive them back into their care. This situation is worse in those whose challenging behaviour includes a forensic history, but the difference between tho...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inBritish journal of psychiatry Vol. 185; no. 6; pp. 499 - 504
Main Authors Reed, Suzie, Russell, Ailsa, Xenitidis, Kiriakos, Murphy, Declan G. M.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Cambridge, UK Cambridge University Press 01.12.2004
RCP
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:People with learning disability who exhibit challenging behaviour are frequently segregated from services and local teams are often reluctant to receive them back into their care. This situation is worse in those whose challenging behaviour includes a forensic history, but the difference between those labelled as challenging and those treated as offenders is not clear, and there is a lack of evidence about treatment effectiveness. To test between-group differences in aggression and treatment outcome in people with learning disability and challenging behaviour, with and without a forensic history. Clinical records of 86 former in-patients (45 offenders and 41 non-offenders) of a specialist unit were compared on measures of behavioural disturbance and placement outcome. People in the offenders group were significantly less likely to be aggressive to others and to use weapons, but significantly more likely to harm themselves compared with the non-offenders group. Both groups had a significant reduction in their challenging behaviour during admission, and there was no significant difference in treatment outcome. The negative reputation of people with learning disabilities who offend needs to be reconsidered.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0007-1250
1472-1465
DOI:10.1192/bjp.185.6.499