Financial distress and its associated burden in couples coping with an advanced cancer

• Published in: Supportive care in cancer Vol. 30; no. 5; pp. 4485 - 4495
• Main Authors: Kroll, Juliet L., Kim, Seokhun, Cho, Dalnim, Weathers, Shiao-Pei, Chen, Aileen B., Smith, Grace, Bruera, Eduardo, Milbury, Kathrin
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Berlin/Heidelberg Springer Berlin Heidelberg 01.05.2022; Springer; Springer Nature B.V
• Subjects: Adaptation, Psychological; Brain cancer; Brain tumors; Cancer; Care and treatment; Caregivers; Caregivers - psychology; Communication; Couples; Health care expenditures; Humans; Lung cancer; Lung Neoplasms; Medicine; Medicine & Public Health; Nursing; Nursing Research; Oncology; Original Article; Pain Medicine; Poverty; Quality of life; Quality of Life - psychology; Rehabilitation Medicine; Spouses - psychology; Stress (Psychology); United States > US; Advanced cancer; End-of-life; Illness communication; Couples; Physical quality of life; Financial distress
• ISSN: 0941-4355; 1433-7339
• DOI: 10.1007/s00520-021-06758-w

Purpose In efforts to understand financial distress (FD) associated with advanced cancer care from the perspective of both patients with incurable disease and their spousal caregivers, we assessed FD in both members of the couple, identified symptom and quality of life (QOL) correlates, and examined the potential role of illness communication. Methods Patients undergoing treatment for stage III/IV lung cancer or a grade III/IV primary brain tumor and their spousal caregivers ( n  = 76 dyads) completed measures of somatic and affective symptoms including FD, physical and mental QOL, and ease of engaging in illness communication. Patients and caregivers additionally rated their perception of each other’s symptoms, including FD. Results FD was endorsed by both patients (any FD 62.7%; high FD 24%) and spousal caregivers (any FD 64.7%; high FD 32.3%). Self-reported FD was significantly correlated (partial r  = .52, p  < .001) within couples. FD was associated with greater symptoms of anxiety ( r  = .29, p  = .01; r  = .31, p  = .01), depression ( r  = 29, p  = 01; r  = .39, p  = .001), and poorer physical QOL( r  =  − .25, p  = .03; r  =  − .25, p  = .001) for patients and caregivers, respectively. For patients, FD was additionally associated with poorer mental QOL( r  =  − .44, p  < .001). Caregivers accurately perceived patient FD, yet patients tended to underreport their caregiver’s FD by almost an entire point ( t  = 2.8, p  = .007). A 3-way interaction (FD X role X illness communication) revealed ( b  = .40, p  = .041) that illness communication moderated the association between FD and physical QOL for spouses so that spouses who reported less ease of illness communication demonstrated a stronger association between financial distress and physical QOL ( b  =  − 2.08, p  < .001) than those reporting greater ease of engaging in illness communication ( b  = .49, p  = .508). Conclusion In the advanced cancer setting, FD is prevalent in both patients and their spousal caregivers and associated with psychological distress and poor physical QOL. Results suggest that optimal FD assessment should include patients and spouses, and spouse’s ease of engaging with illness communication may be a potential target for future intervention studies.