Effect of acute hypoxia on cognition: A systematic review and meta-regression analysis

•Hypoxia has a negative effect on cognition.•Effect on central executive and non-executive tasks did not differ significantly.•Low (<60mmHg) arterial partial pressure of oxygen predicts poor cognition.•Hypobaric versus normobaric hypoxic conditions was not a significant moderator. A systematic me...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inNeuroscience and biobehavioral reviews Vol. 74; no. Pt A; pp. 225 - 232
Main Authors McMorris, Terry, Hale, Beverley J., Barwood, Martin, Costello, Joseph, Corbett, Jo
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States Elsevier Ltd 01.03.2017
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:•Hypoxia has a negative effect on cognition.•Effect on central executive and non-executive tasks did not differ significantly.•Low (<60mmHg) arterial partial pressure of oxygen predicts poor cognition.•Hypobaric versus normobaric hypoxic conditions was not a significant moderator. A systematic meta-regression analysis of the effects of acute hypoxia on the performance of central executive and non-executive tasks, and the effects of the moderating variables, arterial partial pressure of oxygen (PaO2) and hypobaric versus normobaric hypoxia, was undertaken. Studies were included if they were performed on healthy humans; within-subject design was used; data were reported giving the PaO2 or that allowed the PaO2 to be estimated (e.g. arterial oxygen saturation and/or altitude); and the duration of being in a hypoxic state prior to cognitive testing was ≤6days. Twenty-two experiments met the criteria for inclusion and demonstrated a moderate, negative mean effect size (g=−0.49, 95% CI −0.64 to −0.34, p<0.001). There were no significant differences between central executive and non-executive, perception/attention and short-term memory, tasks. Low (35–60mmHg) PaO2 was the key predictor of cognitive performance (R2=0.45, p<0.001) and this was independent of whether the exposure was in hypobaric hypoxic or normobaric hypoxic conditions.
Bibliography:SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ObjectType-Review-1
ObjectType-Article-3
ObjectType-Undefined-4
ISSN:0149-7634
1873-7528
DOI:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2017.01.019