Smart Devices and Wearable Technologies to Detect and Monitor Mental Health Conditions and Stress: A Systematic Review

• Published in: Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) Vol. 21; no. 10; p. 3461
• Main Authors: Hickey, Blake Anthony, Chalmers, Taryn, Newton, Phillip, Lin, Chin-Teng, Sibbritt, David, McLachlan, Craig S., Clifton-Bligh, Roderick, Morley, John, Lal, Sara
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Basel MDPI AG 16.05.2021; MDPI
• Subjects: Anxiety; depression; Electrocardiography; electroencephalogram; Electroencephalography; heart rate variability; Mental depression; Mental disorders; Mental health; Mental health care; Physiology; Regulatory approval; Research methodology; Respiratory rate; Review; Smart devices; smart technology; Software; Stress; Systematic review; Wearable computers; wearable devices; Wearable technology
• ISSN: 1424-8220; 1424-8220
• DOI: 10.3390/s21103461

Recently, there has been an increase in the production of devices to monitor mental health and stress as means for expediting detection, and subsequent management of these conditions. The objective of this review is to identify and critically appraise the most recent smart devices and wearable technologies used to identify depression, anxiety, and stress, and the physiological process(es) linked to their detection. The MEDLINE, CINAHL, Cochrane Central, and PsycINFO databases were used to identify studies which utilised smart devices and wearable technologies to detect or monitor anxiety, depression, or stress. The included articles that assessed stress and anxiety unanimously used heart rate variability (HRV) parameters for detection of anxiety and stress, with the latter better detected by HRV and electroencephalogram (EGG) together. Electrodermal activity was used in recent studies, with high accuracy for stress detection; however, with questionable reliability. Depression was found to be largely detected using specific EEG signatures; however, devices detecting depression using EEG are not currently available on the market. This systematic review highlights that average heart rate used by many commercially available smart devices is not as accurate in the detection of stress and anxiety compared with heart rate variability, electrodermal activity, and possibly respiratory rate.