Efficacy of High-Dose versus Standard-Dose Influenza Vaccine in Older Adults

Improving the efficacy of influenza vaccination in older adults is a challenge. In this randomized clinical trial, a high-dose influenza vaccine was shown to be more effective than a standard-dose vaccine in the prevention of laboratory-confirmed influenza. Between 1990 and 1999, seasonal influenza...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inThe New England journal of medicine Vol. 371; no. 7; pp. 635 - 645
Main Authors DiazGranados, Carlos A, Dunning, Andrew J, Kimmel, Murray, Kirby, Daniel, Treanor, John, Collins, Avi, Pollak, Richard, Christoff, Janet, Earl, John, Landolfi, Victoria, Martin, Earl, Gurunathan, Sanjay, Nathan, Richard, Greenberg, David P, Tornieporth, Nadia G, Decker, Michael D, Talbot, H. Keipp
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Waltham, MA Massachusetts Medical Society 14.08.2014
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Improving the efficacy of influenza vaccination in older adults is a challenge. In this randomized clinical trial, a high-dose influenza vaccine was shown to be more effective than a standard-dose vaccine in the prevention of laboratory-confirmed influenza. Between 1990 and 1999, seasonal influenza caused an average of 36,000 deaths and 226,000 hospitalizations per year in the United States. 1 – 3 Adults 65 years of age or older are particularly vulnerable to complications associated with influenza and account for most seasonal influenza–related hospitalizations and deaths. 2 , 3 Although vaccination currently represents the most effective intervention against influenza and associated complications, 3 , 4 antibody response and protection elicited by the vaccine are lower among persons 65 years of age or older than among younger adults. 5 – 7 Strategies to improve antibody responses to influenza vaccine in the older population, such as increasing the . . .
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
content type line 23
ObjectType-Undefined-3
ISSN:0028-4793
1533-4406
1533-4406
DOI:10.1056/NEJMoa1315727