Assessment of Second-Line Antiretroviral Regimens for HIV Therapy in Africa
Appropriate second-line antiretroviral therapy for HIV infection is needed in resource-limited settings. In a comparison of three protease-inhibitor–based regimens in sub-Saharan Africa, the one that included nucleoside reverse-transcriptase inhibitors performed favorably. The public health approach...
Saved in:
Published in | The New England journal of medicine Vol. 371; no. 3; pp. 234 - 247 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Waltham, MA
Massachusetts Medical Society
17.07.2014
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | Appropriate second-line antiretroviral therapy for HIV infection is needed in resource-limited settings. In a comparison of three protease-inhibitor–based regimens in sub-Saharan Africa, the one that included nucleoside reverse-transcriptase inhibitors performed favorably.
The public health approach of the World Health Organization (WHO),
1
together with large-scale donor funding, has enabled millions of adults and children in sub-Saharan Africa who are infected with the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) to have access to lifesaving antiretroviral therapy.
2
The key principle is the use of simplified, standardized approaches that are feasible on a large scale in resource-limited settings,
1
,
3
including a first-line regimen of two nucleoside reverse-transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs) plus one non-NRTI (NNRTI). In most settings, treatment is monitored clinically and with the use of CD4+ counts, with typically late detection of treatment failure, accompanied by substantial . . . |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0028-4793 1533-4406 |
DOI: | 10.1056/NEJMoa1311274 |