The clinical relevance of a repeat biopsy in lupus nephritis flares

Background. The clinical utility of performing repeat biopsies during lupus nephritis flares is questionable and data pointing towards frequent class switches are based on the old WHO classification. This retrospective study investigates the hypothesis that clinically relevant switches from prolifer...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inNephrology, dialysis, transplantation Vol. 24; no. 12; pp. 3712 - 3717
Main Authors Daleboudt, Gabriëlle M. N., Bajema, Ingeborg M., Goemaere, Natascha N. T., van Laar, Jaap M., Bruijn, Jan A., Berger, Stefan P.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Oxford Oxford University Press 01.12.2009
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Background. The clinical utility of performing repeat biopsies during lupus nephritis flares is questionable and data pointing towards frequent class switches are based on the old WHO classification. This retrospective study investigates the hypothesis that clinically relevant switches from proliferative to non-proliferative lesions and vice versa as determined by the new ISN/RPS classification are a rare event and that repeat biopsies are unnecessary in many cases. Methods. Thirty-five patients with lupus nephritis and one or more repeat renal biopsies were included. Eighty-four biopsies were blindly reassessed according to the ISN/RPS classification. Results. Twenty-five patients had one repeat biopsy, 6 patients had two and 4 patients had three repeat biopsies. Forty-nine comparisons between reference and repeat biopsies could be made. In 25 cases (54.3%), there was no shift in ISN/RPS class on repeat biopsies. In 41 instances, paired biopsies showed proliferative lesions both on reference and repeat biopsies, whereas five of six cases with non-proliferative lesions on a reference biopsy switched to proliferative lesions on a repeat biopsy. Clinically significant class switches during lupus nephritis flares were more frequent in patients with non-proliferative lesions in their reference biopsy (P < 0.001). Conclusion. The results show that patients with proliferative lesions in the original biopsy rarely switch to a pure non-proliferative nephritis during a flare. Therefore, a repeat biopsy during a lupus nephritis flare is frequently not necessary if proliferative lesions were found in the reference biopsy. However, in the case of a non-proliferative lesion in the reference biopsy, class switches are frequently found and repeat biopsies are advisable.
Bibliography:istex:681F0F8B8EF9F1A1490AF7C440EA86779A0EDCDF
ark:/67375/HXZ-29B4QD3D-W
ArticleID:gfp359
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0931-0509
1460-2385
DOI:10.1093/ndt/gfp359