Exaggerated meta-perceptions predict intergroup hostility between American political partisans

People’s actions toward a competitive outgroup can be motivated not only by their perceptions of the outgroup, but also by how they think the outgroup perceives the ingroup (i.e., meta-perceptions). Here, we examine the prevalence, accuracy, and consequences of meta-perceptions among American politi...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences - PNAS Vol. 117; no. 26; pp. 14864 - 14872
Main Authors Moore-Berg, Samantha L., Ankori-Karlinsky, Lee-Or, Hameiri, Boaz, Bruneau, Emile
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Washington National Academy of Sciences 30.06.2020
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:People’s actions toward a competitive outgroup can be motivated not only by their perceptions of the outgroup, but also by how they think the outgroup perceives the ingroup (i.e., meta-perceptions). Here, we examine the prevalence, accuracy, and consequences of meta-perceptions among American political partisans. Using a representative sample (n = 1,056) and a longitudinal convenience sample (n = 2,707), we find that Democrats and Republicans equally dislike and dehumanize each other but think that the levels of prejudice and dehumanization held by the outgroup party are approximately twice as strong as actually reported by a representative sample of Democrats and Republicans. Overestimations of negative meta-perceptions were consistent across samples over time and between demographic subgroups but were modulated by political ideology: More strongly liberal Democrats and more strongly conservative Republicans were particularly prone to exaggerate meta-perceptions. Finally, we show that meta-prejudice and meta-dehumanization are independently associated with the desire for social distance from members of the outgroup party and support for policies that harm the country and flout democratic norms to favor the ingroup political party. This research demonstrates that partisan meta-perceptions are subject to a strong negativity bias with Democrats and Republicans agreeing that the shadow of partisanship is much larger than it actually is, which fosters mutual intergroup hostility.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
content type line 23
Edited by Morris P. Fiorina, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, and approved May 8, 2020 (received for review January 22, 2020)
The authors declare no competing interest.
Author contributions: S.L.M.-B., L.-O.A.-K., and E.B. designed research; S.L.M.-B. and E.B. performed research; S.L.M.-B. and B.H. analyzed data; S.L.M.-B. and E.B. wrote the paper; L.-O.A.-K. and B.H. provided critical revisions; and E.B. supervised data analysis process.
ISSN:0027-8424
1091-6490
1091-6490
DOI:10.1073/pnas.2001263117