Reliable Confidence Intervals for RelTime Estimates of Evolutionary Divergence Times

Abstract Confidence intervals (CIs) depict the statistical uncertainty surrounding evolutionary divergence time estimates. They capture variance contributed by the finite number of sequences and sites used in the alignment, deviations of evolutionary rates from a strict molecular clock in a phylogen...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inMolecular biology and evolution Vol. 37; no. 1; pp. 280 - 290
Main Authors Tao, Qiqing, Tamura, Koichiro, Mello, Beatriz, Kumar, Sudhir
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States Oxford University Press 01.01.2020
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Abstract Confidence intervals (CIs) depict the statistical uncertainty surrounding evolutionary divergence time estimates. They capture variance contributed by the finite number of sequences and sites used in the alignment, deviations of evolutionary rates from a strict molecular clock in a phylogeny, and uncertainty associated with clock calibrations. Reliable tests of biological hypotheses demand reliable CIs. However, current non-Bayesian methods may produce unreliable CIs because they do not incorporate rate variation among lineages and interactions among clock calibrations properly. Here, we present a new analytical method to calculate CIs of divergence times estimated using the RelTime method, along with an approach to utilize multiple calibration uncertainty densities in dating analyses. Empirical data analyses showed that the new methods produce CIs that overlap with Bayesian highest posterior density intervals. In the analysis of computer-simulated data, we found that RelTime CIs show excellent average coverage probabilities, that is, the actual time is contained within the CIs with a 94% probability. These developments will encourage broader use of computationally efficient RelTime approaches in molecular dating analyses and biological hypothesis testing.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Undefined-1
ObjectType-Feature-3
content type line 23
Qiqing Tao and Koichiro Tamura contributed equally to this work.
ISSN:0737-4038
1537-1719
DOI:10.1093/molbev/msz236