Do urea breath test (UBT) referrals for Helicobacter pylori testing match the clinical guidelines in primary care practice? A prospective observational study

• Published in: Journal of evaluation in clinical practice Vol. 14; no. 5; pp. 799 - 802
• Main Authors: Noya, Horowitz, Anat, Beit-Or, Moshe, Leshno, Gennady, Polishchouk, Zamir, Halpern, Menachem, Moshkowitz
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Oxford, UK Blackwell Publishing Ltd 01.10.2008
• Subjects: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Breath Tests - methods; Chi-Square Distribution; Dyspepsia - microbiology; Female; Gastroscopy; Guideline Adherence - organization & administration; guidelines; Health Services Misuse - statistics & numerical data; Helicobacter Infections - complications; Helicobacter Infections - diagnosis; Helicobacter pylori; Humans; Israel; Male; Middle Aged; Patient Selection; Practice Guidelines as Topic; Practice Patterns, Physicians' - organization & administration; Primary Health Care - organization & administration; Prospective Studies; Referral and Consultation - organization & administration; UBT; Urea - analysis; Israel
• ISSN: 1356-1294; 1365-2753; 1365-2753
• DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2753.2008.01039.x

Background  Various international guidelines recommend the use of non‐endoscopic tests [such as urea breath test (UBT)] for the evaluation of dyspeptic patients, unless endoscopy is clinically indicated. Aim  To assess adherence with guidelines for UBT referrals among primary care doctors in Israel. Methods  Patients referred by primary care doctors to an open‐access UBT service were included in the study. Prior to the test, all patients were administered with a short questionnaire regarding their symptoms, previous and concomitant medications including previous Helicobacter pylori eradication. Results  The study sample consisted of 209 patients, aged 18–94 years, M/F = 74/135. The UBT was judged to be appropriate in 94 (45%) subjects, inappropriate in 93 (44.5%) subjects and appropriate but avoidable in 22 (10.5%) subjects, most of them asymptomatic patients following anti H. pylori treatment. The inappropriate indications include 38 (18%) patients with suspected gastro‐oesophageal reflux disease symptoms and 21 (10%) dyspeptic patients aged 45 years or more. Conclusion  Nearly 45% percent of UBT referrals in primary care practice were inappropriate, and a significant number of dyspeptic patients should have been referred to endoscopy. These findings show a substantial non‐compliance with guidelines for H. pylori testing among primary care doctors.