Subclinical Injury to Forearm Nerves During Radial Harvesting: Electrophysiologic Study
Background and Aim: There are few reports about injury to forearm nerves and its potential mechanisms during radial artery (RA) harvesting. We studied electrophysiologic changes in these nerves not sought until now. Methods: Among 152 consecutive patients who underwent coronary artery bypass surgery...
Saved in:
Published in | Journal of cardiac surgery Vol. 21; no. 2; pp. 151 - 154 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
350 Main Street , Malden , MA 02148-5020 , USA and 9600 Garsington Road , Oxford OX4 2XG , England
Blackwell Publishing Inc
01.03.2006
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | Background and Aim: There are few reports about injury to forearm nerves and its potential mechanisms during radial artery (RA) harvesting. We studied electrophysiologic changes in these nerves not sought until now. Methods: Among 152 consecutive patients who underwent coronary artery bypass surgery between February 2002 and August 2002, 20 were randomized for RA harvesting and formed the study group and 20 were randomized as control group. Neurologic examination and electrophysiologic studies were performed for sensory and motor impairment of the nerves in both groups pre‐ and postoperatively. Results: There was no change on neurologic examinations before and after surgery. Electromyography (EMG) revealed significant reduction in sensory and motor conduction amplitudes of median, ulnar, and radial nerves and motor conduction velocities of median and ulnar nerves at the level of forearm in the study group. In the control group, ulnar nerve was mostly affected. When two groups are compared, sensory and motor amplitude drops of median and radial nerves and motor velocity impairment of median nerve in the study group are significant. Ulnar nerve impairments are identical in both groups. Conclusions: Handling of tissues, minor hematoma or edema along with chest retraction best explains these impairments. Patients were asymptomatic after surgery showing that EMG is highly sensitive and is not predictive of clinical impairment. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ArticleID:JOCS197 istex:D87E1015C5EA41CD9C16ECEDAD885FE5FA7E8A40 ark:/67375/WNG-S294GZ51-X ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 ObjectType-Article-2 ObjectType-News-1 ObjectType-Feature-3 |
ISSN: | 0886-0440 1540-8191 |
DOI: | 10.1111/j.1540-8191.2006.00197.x |