Management of neuroborreliosis in European adult patients

Objectives –  To survey present knowledge and controversies in European neuroborreliosis. Material and methods –  The article is based on available literature, own experience, and a speech held by the authors together on the Norwegian annual neurological meeting. Results –  Diagnosis of neuroborreli...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inActa neurologica Scandinavica Vol. 117; no. s188; pp. 22 - 28
Main Authors Ljøstad, U., Henriksen, T.-H.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Oxford, UK Blackwell Publishing Ltd 01.05.2008
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Objectives –  To survey present knowledge and controversies in European neuroborreliosis. Material and methods –  The article is based on available literature, own experience, and a speech held by the authors together on the Norwegian annual neurological meeting. Results –  Diagnosis of neuroborreliosis is based on clinical neurological findings, laboratory support of borrelia infection, and indications of causality between neurological findings and borreliosis. In the absence of means to identify B. burgdorferi, antibody tests are used for laboratory diagnosis. Two to three weeks courses of IV penicillin or ceftriaxone are highly effective in neuroborreliosis. Oral doxycyclin is probably equally effective. Remaining symptoms five years after treatment for neuroborreliosis are reported in 25–50% of patients. Conclusions –  We suggest two levels of diagnostic accuracy; definite and possible neuroborreliosis. These case definitions are proposed to make the basis for treatment decisions. The prognosis of neuroborreliosis and pathophysiology of post‐treatment conditions need further studies. Extensive treatments with antibiotics are not recommended.
Bibliography:ArticleID:ANE1027
istex:98C7DD1C7FCFE293EA4C99FFC40C36E2C635B830
ark:/67375/WNG-BZ0X1HTX-8
Conflict of Interests: The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ObjectType-Article-2
ObjectType-Feature-3
ObjectType-Review-1
ISSN:0001-6314
0065-1427
1600-0404
DOI:10.1111/j.1600-0404.2008.01027.x