Frequency of biochemical hypoglycaemia in adults with Type 1 diabetes with and without impaired awareness of hypoglycaemia: no identifiable differences using continuous glucose monitoring
Diabet. Med. 27, 666–672 (2010) Objective Impaired awareness of hypoglycaemia (IAH) is a major risk factor for severe hypoglycaemia in Type 1 diabetes. Although biochemical hypoglycaemia is asserted to be more frequent in IAH, this has not been estimated accurately. The aim of this study was to use...
Saved in:
Published in | Diabetic medicine Vol. 27; no. 6; pp. 666 - 672 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Oxford, UK
Blackwell Publishing Ltd
01.06.2010
Blackwell |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | Diabet. Med. 27, 666–672 (2010)
Objective Impaired awareness of hypoglycaemia (IAH) is a major risk factor for severe hypoglycaemia in Type 1 diabetes. Although biochemical hypoglycaemia is asserted to be more frequent in IAH, this has not been estimated accurately. The aim of this study was to use Continuous Glucose Monitoring (CGM) to quantify hypoglycaemia in IAH and evaluate its use in identifying impaired awareness of hypoglycaemia.
Methods Ninety‐five patients with Type 1 diabetes were classified as having normal (n = 74) or impaired awareness (n = 21) using an established method of assessing hypoglycaemia awareness. Hypoglycaemia exposure was assessed prospectively over 9–12 months using weekly 4‐point capillary home blood glucose monitoring (HBGM), 5 days of CGM and prospective reporting of severe hypoglycaemia. The frequencies of biochemical and severe hypoglycaemia were compared in patients with normal and impaired awareness of hypoglycaemia.
Results Patients with impaired awareness had a 3‐fold higher incidence of severe hypoglycaemia than those with normal awareness [incidence rate ratio (IRR) 3.37 (95% CI 1.30–8.7); P = 0.01] and 1.6‐fold higher incidence of hypoglycaemia on weekly HBGM [IRR 1.63 (95% CI 1.09–2.44); P = 0.02]. No significant differences were observed with CGM [IRR for sensor glucose ≤ 3.0 mmol/l 1.47 (95% CI 0.91–2.39); P = 0.12; IRR for sensor glucose ≤ 2.2 mmol/l 1.23 (95% CI 0.76–1.98); P = 0.40].
Conclusions Patients with Type 1 diabetes with impaired awareness had a 3‐fold higher risk of severe hypoglycaemia and 1.6‐fold higher incidence of biochemical hypoglycaemia measured with weekly glucose monitoring compared with normal awareness, but 5 days of CGM did not differentiate those with impaired from those with normal awareness. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | istex:25724995E543FB873F17638B101E5393C0B24D0D ark:/67375/WNG-CN4MZMLJ-J ArticleID:DME3006 ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 |
ISSN: | 0742-3071 1464-5491 |
DOI: | 10.1111/j.1464-5491.2010.03006.x |