Pancreaticogastrostomy compared with pancreaticojejunostomy after pancreaticoduodenectomy

Objective: To assess the safety of the pancreatic anastomosis after pancreatico‐duodenectomy (PD). Design: Non‐randomized prospective trial in consecutive patients. Setting: University hospital. Subjects: 171 consecutive patients with resectable periampullary cancer (80%) or intractable pain due to...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inThe European journal of surgery Vol. 165; no. 4; pp. 357 - 362
Main Authors Arnaud, J. P., Tuech, J. J., Cervi, Ch, Bergamaschi, R.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published UK Taylor & Francis, Ltd 01.04.1999
Taylor & Francis
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Objective: To assess the safety of the pancreatic anastomosis after pancreatico‐duodenectomy (PD). Design: Non‐randomized prospective trial in consecutive patients. Setting: University hospital. Subjects: 171 consecutive patients with resectable periampullary cancer (80%) or intractable pain due to chronic pancreatitis (20%) undergoing PD. Interventions: Pancreaticojejunostomy (PJ) and pancreaticogastrostomy (PG). Main outcome measures: Mortality and morbidity rates due to anastomotic leak following PJ and PG. Results: 91 PJ and 80 PG patients were comparable for age, gender, total bilirubin, ASA grading, indication for PD, operating time, pancreas texture, blood loss and replacement. The rate of pancreatic fistula was significantly higher in PJ patients (13%) than in PG patients (3.7%) (12 vs. 3, p = 0.029). Overall death rate was significantly higher after PJ (12%) than after PG (3.7%) (11 vs. 3, p = 0.047). Fatal outcome due to pancreatic leak (3 vs. 1, p = 0.83) and other death rates (8 vs. 2, p = 0.14) were not significantly different in PJ and PG groups, respectively. Conclusion: PJ was associated with significantly higher pancreatic leak rate than PG. However, there was no statistically significant difference in mortality rates directly related to pancreatic leak. Copyright © 1999 Taylor and Francis Ltd.
Bibliography:ark:/67375/WNG-D1P32Q0S-9
ArticleID:EJS744
istex:699C57491E12558EF18C757FCB6F23D8BAEE8BFB
ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
ISSN:1102-4151
1741-9271
DOI:10.1080/110241599750006901