Pediatric respiratory distress: California out‐of‐hospital protocols and evidence‐based recommendations
Objectives Prehospital protocols vary across local emergency medical service (EMS) agencies in California. We sought to develop evidence‐based recommendations for the out‐of‐hospital evaluation and treatment of pediatric respiratory distress, and we evaluated the protocols for pediatric respiratory...
Saved in:
Published in | Journal of the American College of Emergency Physicians Open Vol. 1; no. 5; pp. 955 - 964 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
United States
John Wiley and Sons Inc
01.10.2020
Wiley |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | Objectives
Prehospital protocols vary across local emergency medical service (EMS) agencies in California. We sought to develop evidence‐based recommendations for the out‐of‐hospital evaluation and treatment of pediatric respiratory distress, and we evaluated the protocols for pediatric respiratory distress used by the 33 California local EMS agencies.
Methods
Evidence‐based recommendations were developed through an extensive literature review of the current evidence regarding out‐of‐hospital treatment of pediatric patients with respiratory distress. The authors compared the pediatric respiratory distress protocols of each of the 33 California local EMS agencies with the evidence‐based recommendations. Our focus was on the treatment of 3 main pediatric respiratory complaints by presentation: stridor (croup), wheezing < 24 months (bronchiolitis), and wheezing > 24 months (asthma).
Results
Protocols across the 33 California local EMS agencies varied widely. Stridor (croup) had the highest protocol variability of the 3 presentations we evaluated, with no treatment having uniform use among all agencies. Only 3 (9.1%) of the local EMS agencies differentiated wheezing in children < 24 months of age, referencing this as possible bronchiolitis. All local EMS agencies included albuterol and epinephrine (intravenous/intramuscular) in their pediatric wheezing (asthma) treatment protocols. The least common treatments for wheezing (asthma) included nebulized epinephrine (3/33) and magnesium (2/33). No agencies included steroids in their treatment protocols (0/33).
Conclusion
Protocols for pediatric respiratory distress vary widely across the state of California, especially among those for stridor (croup) and wheezing in < 24 months (bronchiolitis). The evidence‐based recommendations that we present for the prehospital treatment of these conditions may be useful for EMS medical directors tasked with creating and revising these protocols. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | JACEP Open The authors have stated that no such relationships exist. policy, all authors are required to disclose any and all commercial, financial, and other relationships in any way related to the subject of this article as per ICMJE conflict of interest guidelines (see By Meeting presented at the 2018 National Emergency Medical Services Physicians (NAEMSP) Annual Conference, San Diego, California. Supervising Editor: Angela Lumba‐Brown, MD. www.icmje.org Funding and support ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 Funding and support: ByJACEP Open policy, all authors are required to disclose any and all commercial, financial, and other relationships in any way related to the subject of this article as per ICMJE conflict of interest guidelines (see www.icmje.org). The authors have stated that no such relationships exist. |
ISSN: | 2688-1152 2688-1152 |
DOI: | 10.1002/emp2.12103 |