Enterovirus infection among patients admitted to hospital in Hong Kong in 2010: Epidemiology, clinical characteristics, and importance of molecular diagnosis

The activity of hand, foot, and mouth disease (HFMD) in Hong Kong was high in 2010. Real‐time reverse transcriptase‐polymerase chain reaction (RT‐PCR) had been performed routinely for diagnosis of enterovirus (EV) infection among hospitals in a geographical cluster. The aim of the study was to descr...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of medical virology Vol. 85; no. 10; pp. 1811 - 1817
Main Authors Lee, May Kin-Ping, Chan, Paul Kay-Sheung, Ho, Iok-Ieng Yolanda, Lai, Wai-Man Raymond
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Hoboken, NJ Blackwell Publishing Ltd 01.10.2013
Wiley
Wiley Subscription Services, Inc
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:The activity of hand, foot, and mouth disease (HFMD) in Hong Kong was high in 2010. Real‐time reverse transcriptase‐polymerase chain reaction (RT‐PCR) had been performed routinely for diagnosis of enterovirus (EV) infection among hospitals in a geographical cluster. The aim of the study was to describe the epidemiology and the clinical pattern of EV‐related hospital admission in 2010, and evaluate the impact of RT‐PCR compared to conventional method. This was a retrospective study and patients with laboratory confirmed EV infection were included. Demographic information, clinical features, complications, and laboratory findings were analyzed. Among the 113 patients identified, HFMD was the most common presentation (84/113, 74%), followed by meningitis (10/113, 9%). Respiratory (52/113, 46%) and gastrointestinal symptoms like vomiting (36/113, 32%) and diarrhea (15/113, 13%) were quite common. For cases with central nervous system (CNS) or myocardial complications, there were significantly fewer oral ulcer and rash over hands and feet compared to their counter group. Serious infection mainly affected children younger than 1‐year old and adults. Dual infection was noted among seven patients (6%). Compared to RT‐PCR, conventional virus isolation detected only 14–16% of the infections. The relative low culture positive rate could be explained by the circulation of Coxsackie A6 in 2010 which was difficult to be isolated by cell culture. Diagnosis of EV infection among hospitalized patients may not be straightforward. EV RT‐PCR significantly improved laboratory diagnosis and delineation of epidemiology of EV infection compared to conventional methods. J Med. Virol. 85:1811–1817, 2013. © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Bibliography:ArticleID:JMV23663
ark:/67375/WNG-H2J1F24W-X
istex:CBC92EBD998C742582569A5E6539890BDECD1854
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ObjectType-Article-2
ObjectType-Feature-1
ISSN:0146-6615
1096-9071
DOI:10.1002/jmv.23663