Effect of subgingival scaling during supportive therapy

Background, aims: This prospective study was designed to investigate the rôle of root débridement at 3 month intervals for patients with periodontitis whose disease had persisted following the completion of conventional periodontal treatment. Methods: 39 maintenance patients with at least 4 pockets...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of clinical periodontology Vol. 27; no. 8; pp. 590 - 596
Main Authors Jenkins, William M. M., Said, Samsiah H. M., Radvar, Mehrdad, Kinane, Denis F.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Copenhagen Munksgaard International Publishers 01.08.2000
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Background, aims: This prospective study was designed to investigate the rôle of root débridement at 3 month intervals for patients with periodontitis whose disease had persisted following the completion of conventional periodontal treatment. Methods: 39 maintenance patients with at least 4 pockets at least 4 mm deep were assigned to coronal scaling (CS) and subgingival scaling (SS) groups. Probing depths (PD), bleeding on probing (BOP) and relative attachment levels (RAL) were recorded at all eligible sites at baseline and 3, 6, 9 and 12 months later. Plaque index scores were recorded at the 12‐month visit. At every visit, following data collection, both groups received a coronal scaling and the SS group, in addition, received a thorough subgingival débridement. In the CS group, subgingival débridement was performed only for ‘loser’ sites which enhibited loss of attachment 2 mm relative to baseline values. Due to low compliance, only 31 patients completed the study. Thus, data analyses were carried out for 130 sites in 17 CS group patients and 146 sites in 14 SS group patients. Results: During the course of the study, 21 loser sites were identified in each group, but the difference in proportion of loser sites between groups was not significant. Furthermore, although there was a trend toward PD reduction in both groups throughout the study, mean PD, RAL and BOP values were not significantly different from baseline values at any time point, and there were no significant differences between groups with respect to these variables. Mean plaque scores measured at the 12‐month visit revealed no significant differences between groups. Conclusion: These findings call into question the value of performing repeated subgingival scaling at 3‐month intervals for patients with persistent disease.
Bibliography:istex:6B4EBB65E1823E07BCA600D1A56A96666E08F0E5
ark:/67375/WNG-QRTQDMNT-5
ArticleID:JCPE27008590
ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
ISSN:0303-6979
1600-051X
DOI:10.1034/j.1600-051x.2000.027008590.x