Sample size for diversity studies in tetraploid alfalfa (Medicago sativa) based on codominantly coded SSR markers

The number of genotypes investigated per population is important for the reliability of diversity studies. The objective of this study was to determine the sample size for the identification of differences among populations of an outcrossing autotetraploid species, alfalfa (Medicago sativa), using c...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inEuphytica Vol. 171; no. 3; pp. 441 - 446
Main Authors Herrmann, Doris, Flajoulot, Sandrine, Julier, Bernadette
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Dordrecht Dordrecht : Springer Netherlands 01.02.2010
Springer Netherlands
Springer
Springer Nature B.V
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:The number of genotypes investigated per population is important for the reliability of diversity studies. The objective of this study was to determine the sample size for the identification of differences among populations of an outcrossing autotetraploid species, alfalfa (Medicago sativa), using codominantly coded SSR markers. One hundred and twenty genotypes from each of two closely related populations were analysed with two markers. Twenty random subsamples for each of three sample sizes (10, 20 and 40 genotypes) were built. Compared to the populations with 120 genotypes, alleles that were no longer present in subsamples with 40 genotypes were mainly rare, whereas abundant alleles were also excluded in subsamples with 10 genotypes. F ST values for pairs of subsamples between the two populations were always significantly different based on 40 genotypes, whereas for 10 genotypes more than half of the pairs were not significantly different. We concluded that 40 genotypes are a reasonable sample size for diversity studies with closely related populations of tetraploid alfalfa investigated with SSR markers. Twenty genotypes may be an economical alternative for large scale studies, but 10 genotypes were a too low number for reliable results.
Bibliography:http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10681-009-0077-3
ISSN:0014-2336
1573-5060
DOI:10.1007/s10681-009-0077-3