Machine Learning in the Parkinson’s disease smartwatch (PADS) dataset

The utilisation of smart devices, such as smartwatches and smartphones, in the field of movement disorders research has gained significant attention. However, the absence of a comprehensive dataset with movement data and clinical annotations, encompassing a wide range of movement disorders including...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inNPJ Parkinson's Disease Vol. 10; no. 1; p. 9
Main Authors Varghese, Julian, Brenner, Alexander, Fujarski, Michael, van Alen, Catharina Marie, Plagwitz, Lucas, Warnecke, Tobias
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published London Nature Publishing Group UK 05.01.2024
Nature Publishing Group
Nature Portfolio
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:The utilisation of smart devices, such as smartwatches and smartphones, in the field of movement disorders research has gained significant attention. However, the absence of a comprehensive dataset with movement data and clinical annotations, encompassing a wide range of movement disorders including Parkinson’s disease (PD) and its differential diagnoses (DD), presents a significant gap. The availability of such a dataset is crucial for the development of reliable machine learning (ML) models on smart devices, enabling the detection of diseases and monitoring of treatment efficacy in a home-based setting. We conducted a three-year cross-sectional study at a large tertiary care hospital. A multi-modal smartphone app integrated electronic questionnaires and smartwatch measures during an interactive assessment designed by neurologists to provoke subtle changes in movement pathologies. We captured over 5000 clinical assessment steps from 504 participants, including PD, DD, and healthy controls (HC). After age-matching, an integrative ML approach combining classical signal processing and advanced deep learning techniques was implemented and cross-validated. The models achieved an average balanced accuracy of 91.16% in the classification PD vs. HC, while PD vs. DD scored 72.42%. The numbers suggest promising performance while distinguishing similar disorders remains challenging. The extensive annotations, including details on demographics, medical history, symptoms, and movement steps, provide a comprehensive database to ML techniques and encourage further investigations into phenotypical biomarkers related to movement disorders.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:2373-8057
2373-8057
DOI:10.1038/s41531-023-00625-7