Evaluation of dynamic balance among community-dwelling older adult fallers: A generalizability study of the limits of stability test
To establish reliability estimates of the 75% Limits of Stability® Test (75% LOS test) when administered to community-dwelling older adults with a history of falls. Generalizability theory was used to estimate both the relative contribution of identified error sources to the total measurement error...
Saved in:
Published in | Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation Vol. 82; no. 4; pp. 468 - 474 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
New York, NY
Elsevier Inc
01.04.2001
Elsevier |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | To establish reliability estimates of the 75% Limits of Stability® Test (75% LOS test) when administered to community-dwelling older adults with a history of falls.
Generalizability theory was used to estimate both the relative contribution of identified error sources to the total measurement error and generalizability coefficients. A random effects repeated-measures analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to assess consistency of LOS test movement variables across both days and targets.
A motor control research laboratory in a university setting.
Fifty community-dwelling older adults with 2 or more falls in the previous year.
Spatial and temporal measures of dynamic balance derived from the 75% LOS test included average movement velocity, maximum center of gravity (COG) excursion, end-point COG excursion, and directional control.
Estimated generalizability coefficients for 2 testing days ranged from .58 to .87. Total variance in LOS test measures attributable to inconsistencies in day-to-day test performance (Day and Subject × Day facets) ranged from 2.5% to 8.4%. The ANOVA results indicated that no significant differences were observed in the LOS test variables across the 2 testing days.
The 75% LOS test administered to older adult fallers on 2 consecutive days provides consistent and reliable measures of dynamic balance. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-2 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Undefined-1 ObjectType-Feature-3 content type line 23 |
ISSN: | 0003-9993 1532-821X |
DOI: | 10.1053/apmr.2001.21859 |