Correlation of preclinical and clinical biomarkers with efficacy and toxicity of cancer immunotherapy
Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have revealed significant clinical values in different solid tumors and hematological malignancy, changing the landscape for the treatment of multiple types of cancer. However, only a subpopulation of patients has obvious tumor response and long-term survival afte...
Saved in:
Published in | Therapeutic Advances in Medical Oncology Vol. 15; p. 17588359231163807 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , |
Format | Book Review Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
London, England
SAGE Publications
01.01.2023
Sage Publications Ltd SAGE Publishing |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have revealed significant clinical values in different solid tumors and hematological malignancy, changing the landscape for the treatment of multiple types of cancer. However, only a subpopulation of patients has obvious tumor response and long-term survival after ICIs treatment, and many patients may experience other undesirable clinical features. Therefore, biomarkers are critical for patients to choose exact optimum therapy. Here, we reviewed existing preclinical and clinical biomarkers of immunotherapeutic efficacy and immune-related adverse events (irAEs). Based on efficacy prediction, pseudoprogression, hyperprogressive disease, or irAEs, these biomarkers were divided into cancer cell-derived biomarkers, tumor microenvironment-derived biomarkers, host-derived biomarkers, peripheral blood biomarkers, and multi-modal model and artificial intelligence assessment-based biomarkers. Furthermore, we describe the relation between ICIs efficacy and irAEs. This review provides the overall perspective of biomarkers of immunotherapeutic outcome and irAEs prediction during ICIs treatment. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-2 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-3 content type line 23 ObjectType-Review-1 Lin-Peng Zheng and Jing-Yang contributed equally to this study. |
ISSN: | 1758-8359 1758-8340 1758-8359 |
DOI: | 10.1177/17588359231163807 |