Improving vision for surgeons during laparoscopy: the Enhanced Laparoscopic Vision System (ELViS)

• Published in: Surgical endoscopy Vol. 35; no. 5; pp. 2403 - 2415
• Main Authors: Trilling, Bertrand, Mancini, Adrian, Fiard, Gaëlle, Barraud, Pierre Alain, Decrouez, Marion, Vijayan, Sinara, Tummers, Mathias, Faucheron, Jean Luc, Silvent, Sophie, Schwartz, Christel, Voros, Sandrine
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: New York Springer US 01.05.2021; Springer Nature B.V
• Subjects: Abdominal Surgery; Gastroenterology; Gynecology; Hepatology; Laparoscopy; Medicine; Medicine & Public Health; New Technology; Proctology; Surgeons; Surgery; Usability; Vision systems; Animal model; Trocar prototype; Phase 0 medical device evaluation; Enhanced visualisation; Distributed laparoscopy
• ISSN: 0930-2794; 1432-2218
• DOI: 10.1007/s00464-021-08369-2

Background For many abdominal surgical interventions, laparotomy has gradually been replaced by laparoscopy, with numerous benefits for the patient in terms of post-operative recovery. However, during laparoscopy, the endoscope only provides a single viewpoint to the surgeon, leaving numerous blind spots and opening the way to peri-operative adverse events. Alternative camera systems have been proposed, but many lack the requisite resolution/robustness for use during surgery or cannot provide real-time images. Here, we present the added value of the Enhanced Laparoscopic Vision System (ELViS) which overcomes these limitations and provides a broad view of the surgical field in addition to the usual high-resolution endoscope. Methods Experienced laparoscopy surgeons performed several typical procedure steps on a live pig model. The time-to-completion for surgical exercises performed by conventional endoscopy and ELViS-assisted surgery was measured. A debriefing interview following each operating session was conducted by an ergonomist, and a System Usability Scale (SUS) score was determined. Results Proof of concept of ELVIS was achieved in an animal model with seven expert surgeons without peroperative adverse events related to the surgical device. No differences were found in time-to-completion. Mean SUS score was 74.7, classifying the usability of the ELViS as “good”. During the debriefing interview, surgeons highlighted several situations where the ELViS provided a real advantage (such as during instrument insertion, exploration of the abdominal cavity or for orientation during close work) and also suggested avenues for improvement of the system. Conclusions This first test of the ELViS prototype on a live animal model demonstrated its usability and provided promising and useful feedback for further development.