Thermal performance augmentation in a pipe employing hybrid nanofluid and a plate as turbulator with V-shaped double-winglet ribs

• Published in: Scientific reports Vol. 14; no. 1; pp. 7363 - 15
• Main Authors: Fan, Zhongmian, Wang, Lingxiao, Liu, Changjun, Abdollahi, Seyyed Amirreza
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: London Nature Publishing Group UK 28.03.2024; Nature Publishing Group; Nature Portfolio
• Subjects: 639/166/988; 639/766/189; Aluminum oxide; Copper; Geometry; Heat exchangers; Heat transfer; Heat transfer enhancement; Humanities and Social Sciences; Hydrogen; Mathematical models; multidisciplinary; Nanofluid; Passive method; Porous materials; Reynolds number; Science; Science (multidisciplinary); Titanium dioxide; Turbulator; Vortex generator; Vortices; Heat transfer enhancement; Vortex generator; Turbulator; Nanofluid; Passive method
• ISSN: 2045-2322; 2045-2322
• DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-57374-7

This article employs a plate with V-shape ribs inside a tube as turbulator to augment the heat transfer rate. The utilized vortex generators are double-winglets arranged in a V-shape placed on both sides of the plate. The proposed system’s suggested working fluids are water-based hybrid nanofluids, including Al 2 O 3 –Cu/water, Cu–CuO/water, and Cu–TiO 2 /water. This work involves a numerical evaluation of the effects of the type and volume concentration of the examined hybrid nanofluids on the enhancement of heat transfer. The experimental results are used to validate the numerical model. It is worth mentioning that all the obtained numerical results are compared with the simple tube, without any turbulator (vortex generator) and in the presence of water instead of the hybrid nanofluids. Based on the numerical results, it can be concluded that all employed hybrid nanofluids showed improved thermal performance compared to pure water. Furthermore, the differences between the models are more substantial for higher Reynolds numbers than for lower Reynolds numbers. In Re = 30,000, the Cu–TiO 2 /water exhibits the lowest thermal performance improvement (augmentation of about 0.3%), while the Cu–CuO/water at Re = 50,000 exhibits the largest thermal performance improvement (augmentation of approximately 5.7%), in the case of ∅ 1  = ∅ 2  = 0.5%. For ∅ 1  = ∅ 2  = 1%, the Cu–TiO 2 /water at Re = 30,000 has the lowest thermal performance improvement (augmentation of around 1.1%), while the Cu–CuO/water at Re = 50,000 has the most thermal performance improvement (augmentation of roughly 8.7%). According to the augmentation of around 2.8% at Re = 30,000 for Cu–TiO 2 /water and approximately 10.8% at Re = 50,000 for Cu–CuO/water, the thermal performance increase in the scenario of ∅ 1  = ∅ 2  = 1.5% is the lowest. In Conclusion, the Cu–CuO/water hybrid nanofluid with a volume concentration of ∅ 1  = ∅ 2  = 1.5% has the greatest thermal performance value of all the hybrid nanofluids studied.