What is conceptual research in psychoanalysis?
The development of psychoanalysis as a science and clinical practice has always relied heavily on various forms of conceptual research. Thus, conceptual research has clarifi ed, formulated and reformulated psychoanalytic concepts permitting to better shape the fi ndings emerging in the clinical sett...
Saved in:
Published in | International journal of psychoanalysis Vol. 87; no. 5; pp. 1355 - 1386 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
London
Routledge
01.10.2006
Institute of Psychoanalysis Institute of Psychoanalysis (British) Institute of Psycho-analysis |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | The development of psychoanalysis as a science and clinical practice has always relied heavily on various forms of conceptual research. Thus, conceptual research has clarifi ed, formulated and reformulated psychoanalytic concepts permitting to better shape the fi ndings emerging in the clinical setting. By enhancing clarity and explicitness in concept usage it has facilitated the integration of existing psychoanalytic thinking as well as the development of new ways of looking at clinical and extraclinical data. Moreover, it has offered conceptual bridges to neighbouring disciplines particularly interested in psychoanalysis, e.g. philosophy, sociology, aesthetics, history of art and literature, and more recently cognitive science/neuroscience. In the present phase of psychoanalytic pluralism, of worldwide scientifi c communication among psychoanalysts irrespective of language differences and furthermore of an intensifying dialogue with other disciplines, the relevance of conceptual research is steadily increasing. Yet, it still often seems insuffi ciently clear how conceptual research can be differentiated from clinical and empirical research in psychoanalysis. Therefore, the Subcommittee for Conceptual Research of the IPA presents some of its considerations on the similarities and the differences between various forms of clinical and extraclinical research, their specifi c aims, quality criteria and thus their specifi c chances as well as their specifi c limitations in this paper. Examples taken from six issues of the International Journal of Psychoanalysis in 2002-3 serve as illustrations for seven different subtypes of conceptual research. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ArticleID:IJP1355 ark:/67375/WNG-TZFKFDWW-D Modified version of a paper given at the winter meeting of the American Psychoanalytical Association, 21 January 2005. istex:606073422B0F72C3A2DBC7A8FCDDF4A4179EDB37 Chair: Marianne Leuzinger-Bohleber (Frankfurt); Members (2001-5): Folkert Beenen (Amsterdam), Ricardo Bernardi (Montevideo), Dieter Bürgin (Basel), Jorge Canestri (Rome), Anna Ursula Dreher (Frankfurt), Norbert Freedman (New York), Ilse Grubrich-Simitis (Frankfurt), Mark Solms (Cape Town/London); Mary Target (London), Sverre Varvin (Oslo); (Oct 2005): Rachel Blass (Jerusalem); Paulo Duarte Guimaraes Filho (Sāo Paulo);Susana Vinocur Fischbein (Buenos Aires). ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 ObjectType-Article-2 ObjectType-Feature-3 ObjectType-Review-1 |
ISSN: | 0020-7578 1745-8315 |
DOI: | 10.1516/73MU-E53N-D1EE-1Q8L |