N-Acetyl Cysteine (NAC) in the Treatment of Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder: A 16-Week, Double-Blind, Randomised, Placebo-Controlled Study

Background Obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) is a disabling mental illness for which pharmacological and psychosocial interventions are all too often inadequate. Recent preclinical and clinical studies have implicated dysfunction of glutamatergic neurotransmission in the pathophysiology of OCD. Th...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inCNS drugs Vol. 29; no. 9; pp. 801 - 809
Main Authors Sarris, Jerome, Oliver, Georgina, Camfield, David A., Dean, Olivia M., Dowling, Nathan, Smith, Deidre J., Murphy, Jenifer, Menon, Ranjit, Berk, Michael, Blair-West, Scott, Ng, Chee H.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Cham Springer International Publishing 01.09.2015
Springer Nature B.V
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Background Obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) is a disabling mental illness for which pharmacological and psychosocial interventions are all too often inadequate. Recent preclinical and clinical studies have implicated dysfunction of glutamatergic neurotransmission in the pathophysiology of OCD. The amino acid-based nutraceutical N -acetyl cysteine (NAC) is a safe and readily available agent that has been found to modify the synaptic release of glutamate in subcortical brain regions via modulation of the cysteine-glutamate antiporter. Objective The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy and safety of NAC in treating OCD. Methods A 16-week, double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomised trial using 3 g/day of NAC (1.5 g twice daily) in 44 participants (aged 18–70 years) with Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 5th edition (DSM-5)-diagnosed OCD, during 2013–2015. The primary outcome measure was the Yale–Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale (YBOCS), conducted every 4 weeks. Results Analysis of the full sample (intention-to-treat) with repeated measures mixed linear modelling revealed a nonsignificant time × treatment interaction for the YBOCS scale total score ( p  = 0.39). A per-protocol analysis removing protocol violators also failed to show a significant time × treatment interaction for YBOCS total score ( p  = 0.15). However, a significant time × treatment interaction was observed for the YBOCS ‘Compulsions’ subscale in favour of NAC ( p  = 0.013), with a significant reduction observed at week 12 (dissipating at week 16). At 16 weeks, only four (20 %) participants were considered ‘responders’ (YBOCS ≥35 % reduction at endpoint) versus four (27 %) in the placebo group. The NAC was well-tolerated, aside from more cases of heartburn occurring compared with placebo ( p  = 0.045). Conclusion Further research involving NAC for OCD may require larger samples to detect moderate or small effect sizes, involve dosage or formulation differences, use in concert with exposure therapy, or an additional post-study observational period to mitigate study withdrawal. Trial Registration ACTRN12613000310763.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-News-1
ObjectType-Feature-3
content type line 23
ISSN:1172-7047
1179-1934
DOI:10.1007/s40263-015-0272-9