Pancreatoscopy for the next generation: development of the peroral electronic pancreatoscope system

• Published in: Gastrointest. Endosc Vol. 49; no. 3; pp. 366 - 371
• Main Authors: Kodama, Tadashi, Sato, Hideki, Horii, Yoshiyuki, Tatsumi, Yoshihide, Uehira, Hiroshi, Imamura, Yoichi, Kato, Keimei, Koshitani, Tatsuya, Yamane, Yukio, Kashima, Kei
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: New York, NY Elsevier Inc 01.03.1999; Elsevier BV; Elsevier
• Subjects: Biological and medical sciences; Calculi; Calculi - pathology; Chronic Disease; Electronics, Medical; Endoscopes; Endoscopy; Endoscopy, Digestive System; Endoscopy, Digestive System - instrumentation; Equipment Design; Fiber Optic Technology; Humans; Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects); Medical sciences; Miscellaneous. Technology; Models, Biological; Mouth Mucosa; Mouth Mucosa - pathology; Pancreatic Ducts; Pancreatic Ducts - blood supply; Pancreatic Ducts - pathology; Pancreatitis; Pancreatitis - pathology; Performance evaluation; Human; Medical equipment; Digestive system; Technology; Process improvement; Endoscopy; Digital image; Technique; Image; Pancreatic duct
• ISSN: 0016-5107; 1097-6779
• DOI: 10.1016/S0016-5107(99)70015-5

Background: To improve visualization of the pancreatic duct with a pancreatoscope, we have developed the smallest known electronic endoscope, that is, the peroral electronic pancreatoscope. Methods: This instrument (2.1 mm, external diameter) was developed with a 50k-pixel interline charge coupled device. A peroral fiberoptic pancreatoscope was used as control, connected to a video converter. The visibility of both systems was studied with a test chart. The model pancreatic duct, the oral mucosa, and the pancreatic ducts of a healthy control subject and patients with chronic pancreatitis were examined with both systems. Results: The smallest visible interval (with a 5 mm distance between the object and the distal end of the endoscope) was 0.07 mm with the peroral electronic pancreatoscope and 0.2 mm with the peroral fiberoptic pancreatoscope. The electronic instrument produced better images of the model pancreatic duct than the fiberoptic endoscope. A clear image of the small vessels of the oral mucosa was obtained with the electronic but not with the fiberoptic instrument. The fine vessel network of the pancreatic duct was visualized only with the electronic instrument; pancreatic duct stones and rough-surfaced pancreatic duct were shown more precisely with the electronic endoscope. Conclusions: The peroral electronic pancreatoscope provides images of the fine detail of the pancreatic duct and will contribute to the diagnosis of pancreatic diseases.