Performance of the DNA-Citoliq liquid-based cytology system compared with conventional smears
Objective: To evaluate the performance of a new, manual, simplified liquid‐based system, DNA‐Citoliq (Digene Brasil), employed under routine conditions as compared to conventional smears collected from six collaborating private laboratories. Methods: A panel of cytopathologists, who served as the go...
Saved in:
Published in | Cytopathology (Oxford) Vol. 17; no. 2; pp. 86 - 93 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Oxford, UK
Blackwell Publishing Ltd
01.04.2006
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | Objective: To evaluate the performance of a new, manual, simplified liquid‐based system, DNA‐Citoliq (Digene Brasil), employed under routine conditions as compared to conventional smears collected from six collaborating private laboratories.
Methods: A panel of cytopathologists, who served as the gold standard diagnosis, adjudicated discordant opinions.
Results: Of 3206 pairs of slides considered valid for comparison, there were 3008 in full agreement (93.8%), 112 (3.5%) with one diagnostic category discrepancies, and 86 (2.7%) discordant cases. Among the 288 borderline+ by either method, DNA‐Citoliq detected abnormalities in 243 (84.4%), and conventional smears (CS) detected abnormalities in 178 (61.8%) (McNemar test, P < 0.000), a 36.5% increased detection of borderline+ cases.
Conclusions: For mild dyskaryosis, DNA‐Citoliq detected 176 cases and CS 125 cases (McNemar test, P < 0.000); and for moderate+severe dyskaryosis 66 versus 32 cases respectively (McNemar test, P < 0.000). |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ark:/67375/WNG-L6B97Z0X-P istex:EEB07F610DB674110B8EF255AAA844AD5ADA1722 ArticleID:CYT279 Other members of the DNA‐Citoliq Working Group, to be credited as co‐authors: S. Maeda, M. S. B. Leite, E. F. Miziara, A. P. Pinto, A. L. M. A. Horta, J. L. Portugal, C. A. Ribeiro and R. Luzzatto ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 |
ISSN: | 0956-5507 1365-2303 |
DOI: | 10.1111/j.1365-2303.2006.00279.x |