Less-Tight versus Tight Control of Hypertension in Pregnancy

In this trial comparing less-tight control of hypertension (target diastolic blood pressure, 100 mm Hg) with tight control (85 mm Hg) among pregnant women, rates of pregnancy loss, high-level neonatal care, and serious maternal complications were similar between groups. Almost 10% of pregnant women...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inThe New England journal of medicine Vol. 372; no. 5; pp. 407 - 417
Main Authors Magee, Laura A, von Dadelszen, Peter, Rey, Evelyne, Ross, Susan, Asztalos, Elizabeth, Murphy, Kellie E, Menzies, Jennifer, Sanchez, Johanna, Singer, Joel, Gafni, Amiram, Gruslin, Andrée, Helewa, Michael, Hutton, Eileen, Lee, Shoo K, Lee, Terry, Logan, Alexander G, Ganzevoort, Wessel, Welch, Ross, Thornton, Jim G, Moutquin, Jean-Marie
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States Massachusetts Medical Society 29.01.2015
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:In this trial comparing less-tight control of hypertension (target diastolic blood pressure, 100 mm Hg) with tight control (85 mm Hg) among pregnant women, rates of pregnancy loss, high-level neonatal care, and serious maternal complications were similar between groups. Almost 10% of pregnant women have hypertension; hypertension is preexisting in 1%, gestational hypertension without proteinuria develops in 5 to 6%, and preeclampsia develops in 2%. 1 Preexisting hypertension and gestational hypertension before 34 weeks are associated with an increased risk of perinatal and maternal complications. 2 – 4 Blood-pressure targets for women with nonsevere hypertension during pregnancy are much debated. Relevant randomized, controlled trials have been small and of moderate or poor quality; tight control (the use of antihypertensive therapy to normalize blood pressure) has been associated with maternal benefits (e.g., a decrease in the frequency of severe hypertension and possibly in . . .
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
ObjectType-Article-2
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
ObjectType-Undefined-3
ISSN:0028-4793
1533-4406
1533-4406
DOI:10.1056/NEJMoa1404595