Less-Tight versus Tight Control of Hypertension in Pregnancy
In this trial comparing less-tight control of hypertension (target diastolic blood pressure, 100 mm Hg) with tight control (85 mm Hg) among pregnant women, rates of pregnancy loss, high-level neonatal care, and serious maternal complications were similar between groups. Almost 10% of pregnant women...
Saved in:
Published in | The New England journal of medicine Vol. 372; no. 5; pp. 407 - 417 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
United States
Massachusetts Medical Society
29.01.2015
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | In this trial comparing less-tight control of hypertension (target diastolic blood pressure, 100 mm Hg) with tight control (85 mm Hg) among pregnant women, rates of pregnancy loss, high-level neonatal care, and serious maternal complications were similar between groups.
Almost 10% of pregnant women have hypertension; hypertension is preexisting in 1%, gestational hypertension without proteinuria develops in 5 to 6%, and preeclampsia develops in 2%.
1
Preexisting hypertension and gestational hypertension before 34 weeks are associated with an increased risk of perinatal and maternal complications.
2
–
4
Blood-pressure targets for women with nonsevere hypertension during pregnancy are much debated. Relevant randomized, controlled trials have been small and of moderate or poor quality; tight control (the use of antihypertensive therapy to normalize blood pressure) has been associated with maternal benefits (e.g., a decrease in the frequency of severe hypertension and possibly in . . . |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 14 ObjectType-Article-2 ObjectType-Feature-1 content type line 23 ObjectType-Undefined-3 |
ISSN: | 0028-4793 1533-4406 1533-4406 |
DOI: | 10.1056/NEJMoa1404595 |