Review of Alternative Carrier Materials for Ocular Surface Reconstruction

Abstract Severe ocular surface disorders can result in deficiency of limbal stem cells that is potentially associated with chronic inflammation, impaired vision and even blindness. Advanced stem cells deficiency requires reconstruction of the OS with autologous or allogeneic limbal stem cells. To ad...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inCurrent eye research Vol. 39; no. 6; pp. 541 - 552
Main Authors Feng, Yaqing, Borrelli, Maria, Reichl, Stephan, Schrader, Stefan, Geerling, Gerd
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published England Informa Healthcare USA, Inc 01.06.2014
Taylor & Francis
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Abstract Severe ocular surface disorders can result in deficiency of limbal stem cells that is potentially associated with chronic inflammation, impaired vision and even blindness. Advanced stem cells deficiency requires reconstruction of the OS with autologous or allogeneic limbal stem cells. To address such deficiency, a limbal tissue biopsy is taken and limbal cells are expanded on a carrier, which then can be used for OS reconstruction. Human amniotic membrane - currently the most common carrier for transplantation of limbal epithelial stem cells - has the downsides of carrying the risk of disease transmission, limited transparency, variable and unstable quality and low mechanical strength. This article reviews the advantages and disadvantages of the established carrier materials for limbal stem cell transplantation, as well as discussing emerging alternatives, including carriers based on collagen, fibrin, siloxane hydrogel contact lenses, poly( -caprolactone), gelatin-chitosan, silk fibroin, human anterior lens capsule, keratin, poly(lactide-co-glycolide), polymethacrylate, hydroxyethylmethacrylate and poly(ethylene glycol) for their potential use in the treatment of limbal stem cell deficiency.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
ObjectType-Review-3
content type line 23
ISSN:0271-3683
1460-2202
1460-2202
DOI:10.3109/02713683.2013.853803