Comparison of coupling effectiveness among amino-, chloro-, and mercapto silanes in chloroprene rubber

Organoalkoxysilane was grafted onto the surface of precipitated silica (PSi), and the modified PSi was characterized by particle size analysis, DRIFT and 29Si NMR spectroscopy. There were 3 types of organoalkoxysilane used in this work, namely, 3-aminopropyl triethoxysilane (APTES), 3-chloropropyl t...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inPolymer testing Vol. 38; pp. 64 - 72
Main Authors Siriwong, Chomsri, Sae-Oui, Pongdhorn, Sirisinha, Chakrit
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Kindlington Elsevier Ltd 01.09.2014
Elsevier
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Organoalkoxysilane was grafted onto the surface of precipitated silica (PSi), and the modified PSi was characterized by particle size analysis, DRIFT and 29Si NMR spectroscopy. There were 3 types of organoalkoxysilane used in this work, namely, 3-aminopropyl triethoxysilane (APTES), 3-chloropropyl triethoxysilane (CPTES) and bis (3-triethoxysilylpropyl) tetrasulfide (TESPT). The magnitude of the Payne effect, bound rubber content and mechanical properties of chloroprene rubber (CR) filled with unmodified and silane-modified PSi were investigated. Results reveal that the type of silane coupling agent (SCA) affects not only compound processability, but also mechanical properties of the CR vulcanizates. Among the 3 SCAs, it is evident that APTES and TESPT are capable of reducing the filler-filler interaction more efficiently than CPTES, as evidenced by Payne effect results, leading to superior compound processability. Mechanical properties of the CR vulcanizates filled with APTES-modified and TESPT-modified PSi are also greater than those filled with CPTES-modified PSi. This might be ascribed to the combined effects of enhanced rubber-filler interaction and improved filler dispersion.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0142-9418
1873-2348
DOI:10.1016/j.polymertesting.2014.07.003