State and Metropolitan-Area Estimates of Disability in the United States, 2001

We sought to provide estimates of disability prevalence for states and metropolitan areas in the United States. We analyzed Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System data from 2001 for all 50 states and the District of Columbia and 103 metropolitan areas. We performed stratified analyses by demogra...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inAmerican journal of public health (1971) Vol. 95; no. 11; pp. 1964 - 1969
Main Authors Okoro, Catherine A, Balluz, Lina S, Campbell, Vincent A, Holt, James B, Mokdad, Ali H
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Washington, DC Am Public Health Assoc 01.11.2005
American Public Health Association
American Journal of Public Health 2005
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:We sought to provide estimates of disability prevalence for states and metropolitan areas in the United States. We analyzed Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System data from 2001 for all 50 states and the District of Columbia and 103 metropolitan areas. We performed stratified analyses by demographics for 20 metropolitan areas with the highest prevalence of disability. State disability estimates ranged from 10.5% in Hawaii to 25.9% in Arizona. Metropolitan disability estimates ranged from 10.2% in Honolulu, Hawaii to 27.1% in Tucson, Ariz. Regional metropolitan medians for disability (range, 17.0-19.7%) were similar across the Northeast, Midwest, and South and were highest in the West. In the 20 metropolitan areas with the highest disability estimates, the prevalence of disability generally increased with age and was higher for women and those with a high-school education or less. State and metropolitan-area estimates may be used to guide state and local efforts to prevent, delay, or reduce disability and secondary conditions in persons with disabilities.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
Peer Reviewed
Note. The findings and conclusions in this article are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
Human Participant Protection…No protocol approval was needed for this study.
Requests for reprints should be sent to Catherine A. Okoro, MS, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 4770 Buford Highway NE, Mail Stop K–66, Atlanta, GA 30341–3717 (e-mail: cokoro@cdc.gov).
Contributors…C. A. Okoro originated and designed the study, completed the analyses, and led the writing. J. B. Holt assisted with the geographic mapping. L. S. Balluz, V. A. Campbell, and A. H. Mokdad helped interpret the findings. All authors helped to review drafts of this article.
ISSN:0090-0036
1541-0048
DOI:10.2105/AJPH.2004.047308