Computed tomography perfusion evaluation after extracranial–intracranial bypass surgery

Highlights • We compared different perfusion algorithms in EC–IC bypass surgery patients. • Significant differences were found in perfusion asymmetry per algorithm. • Delayinsensitive algorithms seem to detect EC–IC patients with infarct on follow-up.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inClinical neurology and neurosurgery Vol. 136; pp. 139 - 146
Main Authors Vos, Pieter C, Riordan, Alan J, Smit, Ewoud J, de Jong, Hugo W.A.M, van der Zwan, Albert, Velthuis, Birgitta K, Viergever, Max A, Dankbaar, Jan Willem
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Netherlands Elsevier B.V 01.09.2015
Elsevier Limited
Subjects
Adolescent
Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Algorithms
Blood Flow Velocity
Brain - blood supply
Brain - surgery
Carotid arteries
Cerebral blood flow
Cerebral blood volume
Cerebrovascular Circulation
Computed tomography perfusion
Contrast Media
Extracranial–intracranial bypass surgery
Female
Heart surgery
Humans
Male
Mean transit time
Middle Aged
Neurology
Neurosurgery
Patients
Perfusion - methods
Retrospective Studies
Software packages
Tomography, X-Ray Computed - methods
Young Adult
Cerebral blood volume
Extracranial–intracranial bypass surgery
Mean transit time
Computed tomography perfusion
Cerebral blood flow
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

More Information
Summary:Highlights • We compared different perfusion algorithms in EC–IC bypass surgery patients. • Significant differences were found in perfusion asymmetry per algorithm. • Delayinsensitive algorithms seem to detect EC–IC patients with infarct on follow-up.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0303-8467
1872-6968
DOI:10.1016/j.clineuro.2015.06.019