Risk Assessment of Side Branch Compromise After Coronary Bifurcation Stenting ― A Substudy of the 3D-OCT Bifurcation Registry

Background: Side branch (SB) occlusion during bifurcation stenting is a serious complication. This study aimed to predict SB compromise (SBC) using optical coherence tomography (OCT).Methods and Results: Among the 168 patients who enrolled in the 3D-OCT Bifurcation Registry, 111 bifurcation lesions...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inCirculation Journal Vol. 88; no. 6; pp. 959 - 969
Main Authors Akase, Hideaki, Okamura, Takayuki, Nagoshi, Ryoji, Fujimura, Tatsuhiro, Miyazaki, Yosuke, Takenaka, Hitoshi, Matsuyama, Tetsuya, Murasato, Yoshinobu, Yamawaki, Masahiro, Ono, Shiro, Serikawa, Takeshi, Hikichi, Yutaka, Norita, Hiroaki, Nakao, Fumiaki, Sakamoto, Tomohiro, Shinke, Toshiro, Yano, Masafumi, Shite, Junya
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Japan The Japanese Circulation Society 24.05.2024
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Background: Side branch (SB) occlusion during bifurcation stenting is a serious complication. This study aimed to predict SB compromise (SBC) using optical coherence tomography (OCT).Methods and Results: Among the 168 patients who enrolled in the 3D-OCT Bifurcation Registry, 111 bifurcation lesions were analyzed to develop an OCT risk score for predicting SBC. SBC was defined as worsening of angiographic SB ostial stenosis (≥90%) immediately after stenting. On the basis of OCT before stenting, geometric parameters (SB diameter [SBd], length from proximal branching point to carina tip [BP-CT length], and distance of the polygon of confluence [dPOC]) and 3-dimensional bifurcation types (parallel or perpendicular) were evaluated. SBC occurred in 36 (32%) lesions. The parallel-type bifurcation was significantly more frequent in lesions with SBC. The receiver operating characteristic curve indicated SBd ≤1.77 mm (area under the curve [AUC]=0.73, sensitivity 64%, specificity 75%), BP-CT length ≤1.8 mm (AUC=0.83, sensitivity 86%, specificity 68%), and dPOC ≤3.96 mm (AUC=0.68, sensitivity 63%, specificity 69%) as the best cut-off values for predicting SBC. To create the OCT risk score, we assigned 1 point to each of these factors. As the score increased, the frequency of SBC increased significantly (Score 0, 0%; Score 1, 8.7%; Score 2, 28%; Score 3, 58%; Score 4, 85%; P<0.0001).Conclusions: Prediction of SBC using OCT is feasible with high probability.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:1346-9843
1347-4820
1347-4820
DOI:10.1253/circj.CJ-22-0723