Prostate specific antigen density of the transition zone: a new effective parameter for prostate cancer prediction

• Published in: The Journal of urology Vol. 157; no. 4; p. 1315
• Main Authors: Zlotta, A R, Djavan, B, Marberger, M, Schulman, C C
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: United States 01.04.1997
• Subjects: Aged; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Predictive Value of Tests; Prostate - pathology; Prostate-Specific Antigen - blood; Prostatic Neoplasms - blood; Prostatic Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging; Retrospective Studies; Sensitivity and Specificity; Ultrasonography
• ISSN: 0022-5347
• DOI: 10.1016/S0022-5347(01)64961-9

Use of prostate specific antigen (PSA) density to enhance the predictive value of detecting prostate cancer at intermediate PSA levels has been limited due to contradictory results in large scale studies. Most PSA leakage from the benign prostate into the serum comes from the transition zone. Therefore, in patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) and prostate cancer with a serum PSA of less than 10 ng/ml. we studied and compared the values of PSA density of the total prostate and the transition zone. We examined the ability of PSA density of the transition zone to enhance prostate cancer detection in patients with intermediate PSA levels. The volumes of the entire prostate and of the transition zone were determined by transrectal ultrasound. PSA density for both regions was calculated in 88 patients with histologically confirmed prostate cancer (radical prostatectomy), and 74 with BPH and histologically proved benign disease. Average total prostate PSA density plus or minus standard deviation was 0.12 +/- 0.07 and 0.22 +/- 0.12 ng./ml./cc in patients with BPH and prostate cancer, respectively, while average PSA density of the transition zone was 0.21 +/- 0.13 and 1.02 +/- 0.70 ng./ml./cc, respectively (p < 0.0001). If a total prostate PSA density of 0.15 had been chosen, the cancer would have been missed in 34% of the patients compared to 10% if a cutoff value of 0.35 for PSA density of the transition zone had been chosen (p < 0.001). Overall, in patients with a PSA of 0.25 to 10.0 ng./ml. the sensitivity and specificity of PSA density of the transition zone for predicting prostate cancer at a 0.35 cutoff value were 90 and 93%, respectively, compared to 94 and 89%, respectively, for those with a PSA of 4 to 10 ng./ml. In our study PSA density of the transition zone was much more accurate in predicting prostate cancer than was total prostate PSA density for PSA levels of less than 10 ng./ml. With respect to the high sensitivity and specificity, if confirmed in large prospective studies, including patients seen for early diagnosis, PSA density of the transition zone could become a routine tool for urologists in the prediction of prostate cancer in men with a PSA of 4 to 10 ng./ml.