Modelling of blood pressure and total cardiovascular risk outcomes after second-line valsartan therapy: The BSCORE study

Summary Background European guidelines recommend that antihypertensive management should be graded as a function of total cardiovascular risk. Aims To examine the multilevel (patient- and physician-level) determinants of blood pressure and residual total cardiovascular risk outcomes associated with...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inArchives of cardiovascular diseases Vol. 104; no. 8; pp. 428 - 434
Main Authors Lins, Robert, Coen, Nicolas, Aerts, Ann, MacDonald, Karen, Brié, Heidi, Hermans, Christine, Shen, Yu-Ming, Lee, Christopher, Vancayzeele, Stefaan, Mecum, Natalie, Abraham, Ivo
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Amsterdam Elsevier Masson SAS 01.08.2011
Elsevier
Subjects
BP
SD
DBP
ESC
ESH
SBP
OR
ICC
GP
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Summary Background European guidelines recommend that antihypertensive management should be graded as a function of total cardiovascular risk. Aims To examine the multilevel (patient- and physician-level) determinants of blood pressure and residual total cardiovascular risk outcomes associated with second-line valsartan therapy. Methods The BSCORE study was a prospective, multi-centre, pharmacoepidemiological study of the “real-world” effectiveness of second-line valsartan with or without hydrochlorothiazide. Results A total of 3497 patients were recruited by 354 physicians. Mean age was 63.8 ± 12.0 years; 52.3% were male; 20.9% were smokers; 47.7% were dyslipidaemic; and 23.6% had diabetes. On average, reductions in blood pressure and increases in the proportions of patients with controlled blood pressure after 90 days were statistically significant (all P < 0.001). Twenty-one percent of systolic blood pressure and 25.6% of diastolic blood pressure variability at follow-up was attributable to physician-level characteristics. Significant reductions in total cardiovascular risk were observed ( P < 0.001); with 12.5% of the variability in total cardiovascular risk change attributable to physician-level characteristics. Several independent determinants of blood pressure outcomes were identified, many of which are modifiable. Conclusions Second-line valsartan therapy improves blood pressure outcomes under variable real-world conditions, and is associated with a decrease in total cardiovascular risk. Optimizing antihypertensive effectiveness, including the reduction of residual cardiovascular risk, involves managing concomitant conditions and risk factors, improving adherence, and identifying physician-level factors amenable to intervention.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:1875-2136
1875-2128
DOI:10.1016/j.acvd.2010.12.005