Evolution of acute coronary syndrome with normal coronary arteries and normal cardiac magnetic resonance imaging

Summary Background Acute coronary syndrome (ACS) with normal coronary angiography is a frequent clinical situation with an uncertain prognosis. Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMRI) is a powerful tool for differential diagnosis between myocardial infarction (MI), acute myocarditis and Tako-tsubo...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inArchives of cardiovascular diseases Vol. 104; no. 10; pp. 509 - 517
Main Authors Chopard, Romain, Jehl, Jerome, Dutheil, Johanna, Genon, Vincent Descotes, Seronde, Marie-France, Kastler, Bruno, Schiele, Francois, Meneveau, Nicolas
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Amsterdam Elsevier Masson SAS 01.10.2011
Elsevier
Subjects
TTC
TTE
LV
AMI
ECG
LGE
ACS
PE
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Summary Background Acute coronary syndrome (ACS) with normal coronary angiography is a frequent clinical situation with an uncertain prognosis. Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMRI) is a powerful tool for differential diagnosis between myocardial infarction (MI), acute myocarditis and Tako-tsubo cardiomyopathy (TTC). Data are sparse regarding the evolution of patients presenting an ACS with normal coronary arteries and normal CMRI. Aims To evaluate the evolution of patients presenting an ACS with normal coronary arteries and normal CMRI, with a 1-year follow-up. Methods Eighty-seven consecutive patients (mean age, 53 years; 40.2% men) presenting an ACS with troponin elevation and normal coronary arteries by angiography were prospectively included. All patients underwent CMRI at 3-Tesla. Adverse events were recorded with 1-year follow-up. Results A likely aetiology for the acute clinical presentation was established by CMRI in 63.2% of patients (22.7% MI, 26.4% acute myocarditis, 11.5% TTC). During follow-up, one patient in the MI group had a stroke (1.2%). In the myocarditis group, there was one initial cardiogenic shock, one episode of congestive heart failure (1.2%) and nine patients had recurrent chest pain without troponin elevation (10.3%). Two TTC group patients initially presented with cardiogenic shock (2.4%); there were no other adverse events in this group during follow-up. In the remaining 36.7% patients, no clear diagnosis could be identified by CMRI, and no adverse events occurred during follow-up. Conclusion CMRI is a useful tool for the management of ACS presenting with normal coronary angiography, as it helps to ascertain the diagnosis and adapt treatment in a large proportion of cases. Nonetheless, patients with no abnormalities identified by CMRI have an excellent evolution.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:1875-2136
1875-2128
DOI:10.1016/j.acvd.2011.05.004