Effect of High-Intensity Interval Training versus Moderate-Intensity Continuous Training on Cardiorespiratory Fitness in Children and Adolescents: A Meta-Analysis

• Published in: International journal of environmental research and public health Vol. 16; no. 9; p. 1533
• Main Authors: Cao, Meng, Quan, Minghui, Zhuang, Jie
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Switzerland MDPI AG 30.04.2019; MDPI
• Subjects: Adolescent; Bias; Cardiorespiratory Fitness - physiology; Child; Clinical trials; Exercise; High-Intensity Interval Training - statistics & numerical data; Humans; Interval training; Intervention; Meta-analysis; Mortality; Physical Conditioning, Human - physiology; Physical Conditioning, Human - statistics & numerical data; Physical fitness; Review; Studies; Teenagers; high-intensity interval training; adolescent; cardiorespiratory fitness; obesity
• ISSN: 1660-4601; 1661-7827; 1660-4601
• DOI: 10.3390/ijerph16091533

Enhancing cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF) can lead to substantial health benefits. Comparisons between high-intensity interval training (HIIT) and moderate-intensity continuous training (MICT) on CRF for children and adolescents are inconsistent and inconclusive. The objective of this study was to perform a meta-analysis to compare the effects between HIIT and MICT on CRF in children and adolescents. We searched MEDLINE, PubMed, Web of Science, and Google Scholar to identify relevant articles. The standardized mean differences (SMD) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) were calculated to determine the pooled effect size of HIIT and MICT on CRF. A total of 563 subjects from 17 studies (18 effects) were identified. The pooled effect size was 0.51 (95% CI = 0.33–0.69) comparing HIIT to MICT. Moreover, intervention duration, exercise modality, work and rest ratio, and total bouts did not significantly modify the effect of HIIT on CRF. It is concluded that compared with endurance training, HIIT has greater improvements on cardiorespiratory fitness among children and adolescents.