Switch from Enfuvirtide to Raltegravir in Virologically Suppressed Multidrug-Resistant HIV-1-Infected Patients: A Randomized Open-Label Trial

Background. Among patients with multidrug-resistant human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) infection, salvage regimens including enfuvirtide have demonstrated sustained efficacy. Because of reluctance to use subcutaneous injections, raltegravir may be an alternative to replace enfuvirtide withi...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inClinical infectious diseases Vol. 49; no. 8; pp. 1259 - 1267
Main Authors De Castro, Nathalie, Braun, Joséphine, Charreau, Isabelle, Pialoux, Gilles, Cotte, Laurent, Katlama, Christine, Raffi, François, Weiss, Laurence, Meynard, Jean-Luc, Yazdanpanah, Yazdan, Delaugerre, Constance, Madelaine-Chambrin, Isabelle, Aboulker, Jean-Pierre, Molina, Jean-Michel
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Oxford The University of Chicago Press 15.10.2009
University of Chicago Press
Oxford University Press
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Background. Among patients with multidrug-resistant human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) infection, salvage regimens including enfuvirtide have demonstrated sustained efficacy. Because of reluctance to use subcutaneous injections, raltegravir may be an alternative to replace enfuvirtide within a suppressive regimen. We conducted a prospective, randomized, open-label trial to compare the antiviral efficacy and safety of a switch to raltegravir with the efficacy and safety of continuing enfuvirtide. Methods. A total of 170 patients with multidrug-resistant HIV-1 infection and plasma HIV-1 RNA levels <400 copies/mL who were receiving enfuvirtide-based regimens were randomized 1:1 to maintain enfuvirtide or to switch to raltegravir. The primary efficacy end point was the cumulative proportion of patients with virologic failure, defined as a confirmed plasma HIV-1 RNA level ⩾400 copies/mL, over 24 weeks. The secondary end points mainly involved safety. Results. The switch to raltegravir was non-inferior to the maintenance of enfuvirtide, with virologic failure rates of 1.2% in both treatment arms in the intention-to-treat analysis (d=0.01%; 95% confidence interval, −6.7 to 6.8) and 1.2% and 0%, respectively, in the on-treatment analysis (d=1.22%; 95% confidence interval, −5.6 to 8.1). At week 24, 88%–89% of patients in both arms had plasma HIV-1 RNA levels <50 copies/mL. No significant CD4 cell count changes occurred in either arm. Grade 3–4 adverse events and laboratory abnormalities were uncommon and were not different between the treatment arms. Conclusion. A switch to raltegravir was safe, well tolerated, and virologically non-inferior to the maintenance of enfuvirtide in patients infected with multidrug-resistant HIV-1 infection who were receiving suppressive antiretroviral therapy. Clinical trials registration. NCT00454337.
Bibliography:istex:887051C5258C779DEC168A6EA8559ADCB45868E1
ark:/67375/HXZ-S11LFPK5-P
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:1058-4838
1537-6591
DOI:10.1086/605674